http://app.reach.gov.sg/reach/YourSay/YourDiscussionCorner/tabid/117/ptid/414/page/76/totrecs/768/threadid/2427/forumtype/posts/Default.aspx
WINN said
:
Require HDB
explanation! (I am a Guest) said :
http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/04/hdb-caught-red-handed-bending-its-own-rules/
HDB caught
red-handed bending its own
rules
.......
In her letter, Lulu See said “My
partner and I earn more than $8,000, but we were allowed to buy a
unit at The Pinnacle after they reviewed our request”. HDB must now
provide a detailed public explanation as to why its income limit
requirement has not been strictly and fairly enforced for all
new-flat applicants.
.......
I
guess there will no reply for this problem, or only has a reply
similar to the one I have received at 11 Feb 2010(attached at
below), because the enquiry I sent to them were same kind of
problem.
I am waiting for the reply
again because I have sent the following e-mail to ask the same
problem again at 07 April 2010:
"Should
I show you the record of my income when the tenancy was
renewing? Your board never ask me to show, and your staff and
the tenant were assuming the amount of my income, are you all
always do the job in this way? Especially Mr KOH HUNG KHOON,
he seems very sure about my income so he said that the
subsequent renewal were in order. Was he actually know the amount
of my income when he was replying my e-mail? Your board never
ask me to report the income so I did not report it, why Mr Koh
are so sure about my income? "
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply from HDB dated 11 Feb 2010
:
....... We refer to
your email of 26 Jan 2010 to our Quality Service Manager.
2 We have established that the application of the rental flat
concerned as well as the subsequent renewal were in order.
Yours sincerely
KOH HUNG KHOON
HEAD, RENTAL HOUSING MANAGEMENT UNIT
for DEPUTY DIRECTOR (RENTAL HOUSING)
HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
The above msg was posted at
16/04/2010, I have sent 2 e-mail to HDB at 07/04/2010, HDB has
replied 2 messages to me at 17/04/2010 11:30:58 and 17/04/2010
11:29:29
respectively, both replies used same title and have same contents,
I can only guess that one of it is for the above
enquiry.
I have enquiry for the income ceiling problem for many times,
and everytime the reply was same as the following reply.
Therefore, I guess Lulu See will also fail, HDB would not provide a detailed
public explanation as to why its income limit requirement has not
been strictly and fairly enforced for all new-flat applicants. They
would also ask her goto HDB office for a discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------
Reply from
HDB dated 17/04/2010 :
We refer
to your email of 07/04/2010.
To address your concerns, please call at our Branch Office for a
discussion.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
HO WEI KHEONG JEFFREY
SENIOR EXECUTIVE ESTATES OFFICER
FOR HEAD, SIMS DRIVE BRANCG OFFICE
HOUSING ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT