Change is often exciting. A belief of a better tomorrow, a
better life for all, from the humdrums of daily living. Mankind are
often creatures of habit and find their own existance within a
protected shell known as his comfort zone, and yet some would
become bored, to seek change for the sake of change based on his
perception and beliefs, rousing others to his crusade of
change.
If the X-rated Fraud is not at its best when it utilise
its pseudo-intellect to pursue its grand standing performance that
leads itself to nowhere.
If "Change is
exciting" and lead to "A belief of a better tomorrow, a better life for
all" - is the pseudo-intellect implying that such
desired for change is a consequence of "boredom, to seek change for the sake of
change" - which is NOT to be desired ?
Has the X-rated Fraud repeated its master stroke at Double-XX
itself again ?
Is it any wonder that the X-ratef Fraud cannot pull itself out
of its pseudo-intellectual mode, as "change is too much an
effort for the sake of change only" - and being a Fraud is
more exciting that will lead itself to a fraudulent belief of a
better tomorrow, and a better fraudulent life for all except to
itself and its master that wag its tail ?
For every berlin wall torn down, there is another tale of
walls being erected.
The China monarchy was abandoned and Sun Yat Sin thought a new
era was borned. He was wrong, and could not withstand even the japs
from gobbling Manchuria. Warlords ruled and the common citizens
lives were no better, only worse.
With its pathetic claim to being a disinterested
student in History, it is amazing that the X-rated Fraud will
dare to pass any of its personal views about Historical events.
What possibly could the X-rated pseudo-intellect intend to mean
in its statement that -"the China monarchy was abandoned"
?
Which "China Monarchy
was abandoned" ? When was the China monarchy
or dynasty abandoned, and replaced by who - and which caused
"Sun Yat Sen thought a new
era was borned" ?
Did Sun Yat Sen waited for the China Monarchy
to be abandoned before appearing on the political scene
as the Father of Modern Republic of China ?
Along came an idealistic concept of rule under commie Mao,
who maneuvered his position capably and kicked out Warlord
Chiang and ruled China. Yet for all the idealism the commie
promised, millions of lives were lost.
It is amazing that with three lines, the X-rated Fraud will
attempt to exercise its pseudo-intellect to make
a comprehensive rundown of the History of Mao and his
Communist ideology that defeated Chiang Kai-shek.
It is even more entertaining when at the same
paragraph, it will also be dismissive of the role that Mao
played in bringing China out of the ruins of WW-2
and prevented the return of the Colonial Powers to dominate
China in the new 20th Century.
What did the X-rated Fraud consume for its daily diet to
bring itself to make such strident claims with so much reckless
bravado ?
Similarly, hunger for change, the french bravely stormed the
Bastille and remove the head of the sun king, yet they only
recieved Napolean the dictator who wrecked havoc in Europe,
with the french paying the price.
For one who has shown little interest in history in any part of
the World, is the X-rated Fraud certain of its expertise to mix a
cocktail of history to suit its own political line of
thinking ?
The French King Louis XIV was known as the Sun King and lived
through the period of 5 September 1638 till 1 September 1715 - he
ruled for a period of 75 years.
If the Sun King was overthrown by a revolution, why
did history record that he was succeeded by his five-year old great
grandson, Louis de France ?
Napolean Bonaparte was born on 15 August 1769, almost 54
years after the death of the Sun King.
How did the brilliance in the X-rated Fraud see the
immediate transition from the demise of the Sun King to a Napolean
that wrecked France ?
Equally hungry for change, the Bolsheviks
removed the Tsar, and had to be contented with Stalin and
being murdered by him.
Did the X-rated Fraud stopped for a moment to think why were the
Bolsheviks "hungry for change" - and caused that
"hunger" ?
After the overthrow of the Tsar in the Russian Revolution had
actually begun in 1905 and consisted of a series of revolution that
culminated in 1917 that totally destroyed the Tsarist autocracy,
and led to the formation of the Soviet Union as the world knew.
Did Stalin stepped in to takeover from the Tsar - as the X-rated
pseudo-intellect intend to have its wider audience to believe in
the X-rated rushed knowledge about history by its shallow
interest in the historical past ?
Conveniently, with its X-rated method in handling big issues, it
will "white-wash" the success of the Bolshevik October Revolution
in forming the Bolshevik party led by Vladimir Lenin to form
themselves as leaders of the new Soviet Government, and with their
revolutionary leader Leon Trotsky.
Stalin was only a minor figure and did not rise into prominence
until the Bolsheviks broke into two factions that led to a
Civil War over ideology.
Were the Russian murdered by Stalin, or could Russia have
survived the onslaught of Hitler's double-cross without Stalin's
guiding hands ?
It is a surprise that the X-rated Fraud will cast aspersions on
Stalin's methods, when its pseudo-intellect will not
see Stalin's ghost in the role of a "Singapore Stalin"
that is professionally and realistically played by LKY.
The Zimbabwe africans remove the colonial whites and ended up
with Mugabe.
Conveniently, having touched on the continent
of Africa, the X-rated Fraud can only see the evils of Mugabe,
but have no ability to link the petty of politics of Mugabe with
that of LKY.
Was it a deliberate act of deceit that the X-rated Fraud will
not even mention that with the removal of Aparthied in South
Africa, the South African natives found a voice for themselves in
their homeland after more then 100 years of oppression by the
Whites who ruled over them.
The lists goes on with 'change'. And here in Singapore, does
anyone wants to contend with the Outlaw, with his followers
- unconstitutional beasts and denial of freedoms type animals
whom smearing others who disagree with them is second nature,
possibly murder when power is gain as evidently seen by
their rapacity for mind control presently?
For one who believes that - "Change is exciting" and lead to
"A belief of a better tomorrow, a
better life for all" - is it not a surprise that its
positive spark of intelligent hope could be so quickly
diminished, even as its inverted propensity to spread
fear, despair and negativism will grow as quickly with it
deliberate act of dropping the curtain down to
block the light ?
Fear can only fear itself, should one with hope have any fear at
all ?
What possibly could be the agenda of one who will spread doubt,
negativism, and lethargy - even as it will know that
"change is a belief of a better
tomorrow, a better life for all" ?
One can only suspect that "change" is only available to the
"privileged and exclusive", who can "afford" the "changes" that
they seek to maintain their status quo, while those who are
not in the privileged and exclusive circle are kept out of the
loop of "change".
Change in the status quo require too much sacrifice from the
priviledged and the exclusive, as their operating philosophy is one
of self-interest and self-centeredness
You readers be the judge, and it is hope that all are aware that
change can only occur at a pace when citizens are prepared and
ready for it so that none gets left behind, and not forced upon or
manipulated by others.
It is amazing that the pseudo-intellect will want its wider
audience to judge, when it had clearly promoted in its opening
statement that "Change is
exciting" and lead to "A belief of a better tomorrow, a better life for
all" - yet it has to the capacity to place a caveat
that change can only occur when citizens are prepared and ready for
it.
How does the pseudo-intellect intend to elaborate an ingenious
web of deceitful standards that present itself as obstacles for any
change to occur ?
How does the pseudo-intellect intend to elaborate the
standard of measure
to determine when citizens are prepared and ready for
change to occur ?
Why should change occur that will result in someone getting left
behind ?
Can the pseudo-intellect of a X-rated Fraud guarantee any
works that can be 100 per cent fool-proof in successful
implementation ?
While a system can be designed to prevent change from being
"forced upon or manipulated by
others" - who will "police the policemen" ?
It will now seem that the X-rated Fraud is repeating the same
regurgitated lines of the master - whose tail when wagged will
shake the body of a X-rated Fraudulent Dog.
The master is afraid of change, as change means its own power to
wield its tail is lost, and it is not a surprise that the dog will
protect its master's tail, as the life of a dog is reflected in the
tail.