Another wall of text, rant and further insults?
And for what?
And what are your points?
Addeums by our freely elected representatives in a free
election, of our own choice, are illegal?
Freely elected representative of our own choice ?
In the 2006 Elections, the Registered List of
Electorates had numbered '2,147,840 citizens, with only 1,123,000 valid votes
accepted from a Total Participating Electorate of 1,222,884’
(*1)
This number of valid votes received is pathetic considering
that Singapore has a ‘Total Population of 4,401,400 Singaporeans – from 0
to 65 years and over (July 2006 est)’ (*2)
To make it simple for you to grasp the significance of the
Election 2006, by any international election
standards the following conclusions from the results
prove that Singapore's Election is a sham -
- when only 27 percent of the Total Population had actually
participated in the Election.
- when the PAP's win of 748,130 votes had amounted to
only 34.83 per cent of the Total Registered List of
Electorates at 2,147,840 Singaporeans - even as the PAP
dishonestly celebrate the hoopla in their false claims of
overwhelming victory with a skewed election that left
almost half of Singaporeans sitting at home.
The Elections in Singapore are similar to the skewed
‘Merger Referendum of 1962’
(*3) - which had been conducted with the
three false choices - that were misleading and had the final result
of the only determined choice of ONE to push for merger of
Singapore with Malaysia as intended by LKY.
Dr Chee, by his blatant and consistant assualt on our
constitution to be treated ABOVE THE LAW, thumbing his middle
fingers figuritively at our judiciary and elected
representatives, by his actions, is doing our society good and
elevating it, on economic and social terms?
Who's doing the 'raping' of our constitution now?
When the Constitution had already been bastardised and made into
a useless piece of paper - that is validated by a falsely
elected majority in Parliament going out of its authority to
pass legislations that will subjugate the Executive,
the Legislative and Judiciary bodies of civil
society to be under the PAP's rule - is there any
more Rule of Law ?
Even when the legislation had clearly stated that no politician
should be within 200 meters of any polling station. In the 1996
Election, the Opposition Parties had protested that the PAP
Goh Chok Tong and Tony Tan were found loitering
inside the polling stations.
‘The Attorney General was disingenuous in circumventing
the legislative wordings by claiming that the PAP incumbents cannot
be said to be near the Polling Station, as they were INSIDE the
station, and hence they did not infringe the law.
(*4)
Is the common sense of Singaporeans not being raped
?
Should we be surprised that the PAP will act with such
arrogance - when their supreme leader holds such low opinions of
subjugated Singaporeans ?
Almost twenty years now, it is obvious that Lee Kuan Yew
see the completion of his prediction of a more stupid society
and dumb people existing in his society.
Should we not be surprised with opinions like yours being a
fulfillment of LKY's expectations made twenty years ago ?
Dr. Chee's simple book, untested and untried, is the bible
to economic prosperity for Singapore?
If you compare what Dr Chee had written in his books since
1992, and compared his ideas with the PAP changes made to the
education policies and some economic directions taken in Year 2002
and 2003 - you will perhaps be more discerning with your views.
More then eight years had passed, and at least two generation of
Singaporeans had to endure the consequences of failed policies that
stubbornly lasted through two recession in 1987 and 1992.
Without much fanfare, the changes were made - and CSJ's
vindication was ignored and obviously not acknowledged - least
of all by the PAP leadership and their lackeys
What I do or how I think is not important.Regardless if I am a
fence sitter or not, is not vital to anyone here, for I am only a
post of text.
Rather, it is your unwavering support for an outlaw that is more
critical to the further developement of our nation.
Should your ignorance and hypocrisy be recognised in
your ability to slant new ways to view the
reality ?
Obviously, you cannot be vital to the future of
Singapore, when your opinion is clearly supporting the
legalised outlaw activities of those currently in office,
whose actions are designed to rape common sense, and
legitimately steal from the Citizens.
If Dr Chee is made to be an outlaw, it is designed by the
outlaws who hold the keys to the legislature by deceit and
guile.
Was Chia Thye Poh a Communist like those ‘‘Catholic Activists who were accused by LKY to be
Marxist Conspirators in the Siglap Catholic Church’’
(*5) ?
Those Catholics succumbed to the abusive bullying and
threats from ISD controlled by LKY, and were released only after
they signed false statements admitting to the accusation that were
made without any evidence.
Why was Chia Thye Poh released without giving any
undertaking - whether verbal or written in the same manner as the
Catholic Activists ?
Was it not a fact that Chia was accused to be a Communist,
and locked up for 32 years on the statement of one Man ?
Is your opinion that Dr Chee is an Outlaw valid in any
way ?
The skewed politics practised by LKY and his PAP is designed
only for the purpose of perpetuating themselves in
monopolising politics, and supporting opinions like yours
- dishonestly disguised as mere onlookers - is simply
disingenious.
We do not need or want circus acts to elevate our lives. We need
real people of substance, who dares to face challenges
intelligently, and not clowns attempting to unseat the throne
for his own personal glory.
The circus is already here, and you are already part of the act
with LKY as the Circus Ring Master.
If he tell you to jump through the hoop, will you not
jump for the success of his circus ?
It is only your limited intelligence and inability to be
discerning that prevent you from distinguishing between the various
shades of White - when your eyesight has been blinded over 52
years bathed in a constant white glow that distort your vision with
an unclear appreciation of visual depths.
Do you think that LKY will work for the glory of Singaporeans -
whom he claimed to be dumb based on his eugenics beliefs ?
Ignoramus, self denial, naivety or whatever crap are only
words from your foul mouth, Others, I trust, will be more
discerning in reading up posts, to know the difference.
All these many posts could have been avoided, if only Dr.Chee
applied for a permit, and engage public security men provided free
by our society, to ensure safety, That alone shows clearly his
irresponsibility.
Can you match your reading abilities with those who are
more discerning in their interpretations of what they read, or do
you depend on the interpretation of what others have read to know
the difference ?
If you beleive that the Police under the control of Wong Kang
Seng will be allowed to assist Dr Chee to get his permits speedily,
why do you not assist Dr Chee in applying permits on his or
SDP behalf ?
That will save all your heartburn to
accuse Dr Chee to be an outlaw.
Or are you only talking from a naivete virginal point of
view - like an eager recruit at BMT expert at "singing cock
and talking song" ?
None is perfect, allowances can be made, but he is a class act
on his own with his consistant repeated attempts for self glory,
absolutely nothing to do with our own liberty, freedom and
adherence to the rule of law as is our responsibility in our
multi-ethnic society.
This is the outlaw you attempt to glorify and seek
followers?
When you fail in your attempts to achieve your
goals to correct some wrongs - are you not
more determined to pursue the course, or are you the type who
will give up in the face of the challenge in going it alone ?
If Singapore had you in the 1950s, will we have class acts of
heroism with names like Lim Bo Seng, Elizabeth Choy, Tan Kar Kee
and the other early pioneers ?
Even JBJ was derided with the worst name calling efforts by an
insecure LKY - if we follow your naive ignorance in accepting
the Bible truth of LKY's opinions - should we not slap you back to
conciousness, when suddenly LHL praised JBJ for being a true
Singaporean for his determined efforts ?
Outlaw today when it is convenient, and a Hero tomorrow when it
suits your agenda ?
Labels cannot hide the truth of the political agenda.
Read the agenda of the SDP and see how much efforts have been
made by their members to move in the direction of the stated
agenda.
Did PM LHL renegade on his own words in his first speech
after being sworn in as PM ?
‘"We should have the confidence to engage in robust
debate, so as to understand our problems, conceive fresh solutions
and open up new spaces," he said. "Ours must be an open and
inclusive Singapore. Therefore, do not wait to be invited to tea,
but step forward to make a difference."’ (*6)
Dr Chee would have less problems in getting the Police to give
him the permits - if Wong Kang Seng has listened to PM LHL's
speech.
Or perhaps, PM LHL was also "singing cock and talking song"
?
Both of you would have made a good combination at some Karaoke
outfit - perhaps you guys were bunkmates at BMT ?
