Another wall of text
This time doubled, resorting to insults despite my overtures to
reach out to you, rebuff with venom.
For what?
Your ability to see the wall of text clearly confirms the myopia
that you possess in attempting to deflect the many controveries
that you prefer to indulge in.
Have you no response to my reply, which had
simply dissected your entire post for detailed response ?
What are your points?
To justify your support for an outlaw, which you now in black
and white clearly state?
New ideas of what? Freedom to make use of others to become a
ruler through anarchy?
Yes, brilliant reply considering that you avoided to address the
various points given that debunked your myopic positions, and
now taking a new tangent.
Who is creating anarchy ?
Is this a new idea ?
The call for the return of the Political Rights to Singapore has
been ongoing for more then 52 years - when even LKY had called for
this same Rights to be returned by the Colonial Government and from
the Malaysian Federal Government.
Obviously, you prefer to be selectively myopic.
Was Dr Chee calling for riot to depose of the PAP, or
was he challenging the unlawful acts of a PAP dominated
Parliament to change the Constitution that disenfranchised
Singaporeans while the PAP hold themselves unaccountable and
non-transparent for their actions ?
Freedom, in the comfort and peace of your air con room today, to
disparage against others whom live in difficult times, of a time
where supposedly protectors fled, leaving untrained for warfare
citizens to the mercy of the mighty conquerors, never knowing if
they may be alive one day to the next?
Was it disparaging untruths, or are the truths spoken so
disparagingly honest ?
Why should there be others living in difficult times if the PAP
had taken measures to prevent such difficult times to fall
on Singapore ?
Are they not supposed to be the elites with the talents and the
merits that justify being paid the highest wages amongst all the
world government presidents and ministers ?
Obviously, we will never know if we may not be alive one day or
the next, when our CPF savings are continuously prevented from
bailing us out in times of joblessness, recessions, and even as we
arrived at our retirement age.
With the CPF withdrawal age continuously being manipulated now
to 85 years, and with holding sums continuously increased - and new
programs that deduct what little is left in the balance -
can Singaporeans be sure that they will get back what they have
contributed all their working lives ?
Under such conditions can we be certain if we can live through
one day or the next ?
If you wish to take on the role of being the mouthpiece and
brain for the PAP - perhaps you have all the answers for such
concerns ?
Freedom to criticize the ruling party for rising costs, when the
realities to provide for a nation in social spending such as
ours is never easy?
Have you considered that Sweden has the highest social cost in
the World that is coupled with the highest tax regimes that created
the well publicised high costs - and yet they have a satisfied
and happy citizens that have even boosted their birth rates in
this 21st Century ?
Considering that Singaporeans are paying as much as the Swedes
in terms of direct and indirect taxes, and a major portion of
our wages is paid to the government for all the essential
services that the government provide and charge at market
rates despite the capital costs being funded from National Reserves
- do Singaporeans get as much government support as the
Swedes ?
Does the falling Singapore Birth Rate not tell
something, or perhaps your myopia prevent the grey cells from
understanding the bigger picture ?
Freedom to insult and abuse others, claiming fresh and untried
outlaw bullshit is good for our society?
Are you not insulting and abusing others with your claim of
others being an outlaw ?
Was J.B. Jeyeratnam not similarly debased by the likes of you,
who are encouraged to imitate the vile vitrol from LKY's colorful
ability to insult his opponents whom he feel insecure when
challenged vigorously ?
Was LKY not a fresh and untried "outlaw" when he first
stepped into politics during the Colonial Days associating himself
with the leftwing and watched with concern by the British
Special Branch ?
Freedom to praise a politically romantic dead
but ineffectual politician wannabe, and lamblast others for
saying kind words in obituary of his passing?
What are you alluding to with this new bald lie to create some
new controversies ?
Are you suggesting that Dr Chee had lambasted J.B.Jeyeratnam
prior to his death and subsequently saying kind words on his
passing ?
Did the PAP say anything kind to JBJ on his passing, other then
the belated and minimalist ritualistic words of condolence to
the family members of JBJ ?
If anything humane that came from the PAP to the Jeyeratnam
family, it had come only from Goh Chok Tong's personal intervention
in writing a letter to both JBJ's son - to be used in their
job applicatin to any prospective employers that they should
be considered on their own qualification and merit, when most
employers had shunned them for the high public profile taken
by their controvesial father.
This focus the degrading level of politics in Singapore as
projected by LKY and the PAP in which they operate the
pervasive fear element that filter down to the social and
commercial world.
Is Singapore not already being managed by Outlaws who abuse
their political powers that will strangle the possibility of anyone
making a living for deciding to enter politics and challenge the
position of the PAP ?
Obviously, as a myopic and dull witted supporter of the PAP, you
can hardly discern nor will admit to such a Third World Political
environment, despite all the glitter of a false image of a First
World environment.
I can go on, but in the end, the more you try to justify your
hatred and support for an outlaw, the more ridiculous you become,
suspending logic and reason, more so when you need to insult, step
over other's heads to be heard, following the example of your
beloved outlaw.
Is it not surprising that your line of thought imitates the
Outlaws in power, in similar ways when they are threatened by the
truth and facts of the abuses employed by Third World politicians
pretending to be in a First World Singapore ?
Does anyone need to justify any hatred, when the reasons for the
pitiable conditions that Singapore has been brought down by the
Outlaws in power, when the standards of politics could
have matched the glass and glitter of the First World
environment ?
Perhaps the reason for such Third World Politics is due to
the fact that the glass and glitter of the First World environment
is all a sham that hides the Third World living conditions that
continue to exist in the heartlands of Singapore ?
My hand is still reached out, for you are my fellow citizen. Be
an opposition party member as is your right and choice. Elevate
your party by smearing the present with half truths and lies as is
your choice.
Which part of what has been said are the half-truths and
lies as you have alluded ?
Are you too afraid to confront the issues as I have confronted
your positions by dissecting the controversies in each paragraph of
your response ?
Smearing and spreading half-truths and lies about the Opposition
is a unique art that is practised by the PAP - which it is
doubtful that you will admit even as you are imitating it.
But do be aware that many others will needlessly suffer, not
because of 'new and untried' methods to deal with challenges, but
rather, made to suffer for the ambitions of outlaw knaves
attempting to be rulers, believing themselves above the law, just
as you are suffering now by being dishonest to yourself and
insulting your own intelligence with your pathetic
justifications.
The problem with "fear" to the unknown is "fear" itself.
Has the evolution of the homo sapien not involved
a continuous cycles of tackling the untried, and dealing with the
new challenges with new and untried ways ?
With your unchallenged and confirmed myopic attitude, we can
surely depend on your suggestions that we stay in the status quo
when old methods no longer are effective - that has been the PAP's
position since 1987.
Should we listen to foolish and unthinking knaves like
yourself preferring to outlaw others who have the decency to make
personal and family sacrifices for their personal beliefs that
the present abuses to the basic tenets of Singapore are
wrong.
It is strong personal convictions in the truth and
honesty of one's actions that have made strong characters out
of challenging circumstances.
The first generation of political leaders know of these
circumstance.
Unfortunately LHL had a cushy upbringing, and even his
NSF days were molly-coddled as a "Super White
Horse" through special programmes that benefitted him and his
fortunate batch; and with the training that did not
give him any foundation as an officer leading men in tactical
circumstance, but taking a helicopter perspective
of training manouvres at BMT to OCS that had
prepared him at these early stages for his destined role
as a General.
If the Opposition Members have been made to be an Outlaw - to
face the challenges designed by the Outlaws in Power, Singapore
would be assured that such a politician has the experience from the
challenges designed by the Master Outlaw himself.
Unfortunately, what can you know of your own abilities, when it
has been your declared act of avoiding untried methods when faced
with unknown challenges and preferring not to suffer ?
