You're clearly blinkered, because you cannot see that the
biological roles of fathers and mothers are separate from their
roles in society. The former can't change but the latter can. You
have been conditioned to believe that the role of the father in a
child's life and family life is vital when it is a construction of
society. Communities where spouses were common to all have
existed.
You constantly avoid saying openly your beliefs that sexual
attraction is a choice. It isn't. It has probably never occured to
you that some people never developed feelings of attraction to
members of the opposite sex. Acting on one's sexual orientation or
denying it is a choice. However, homosexuals are not foisting their
lifestyle onto you. No one is holding a gun to your head to join
them - let them live their lives without worrying about getting
attacks from the likes of you. They pass away, heterosexual couples
reproduce, most of the kids eventually become biological parents
themselves, and mankind goes on. I brought in examples of
disabilities and hereditery diseases to show up the hypocrisy of
your reasoning. And on the topic of traditions...is your mother,
sister or daughter allowed to leave the house? You shouldn't let
them, and bring back other past traditions that were maintained for
ages for the "good of society", including slavery.
You also have some flawed impression that nature exists for the
purpose of exploitation by humankind. The signs are already there
for all to see, but mankind has continued to sit on its collective
bum and reap as much money as it can. Are you going to wait until
it totally irreversible before you decide to act?
Your posts are so riddled with unquestioned assumptions and
outmoded points of view that it's better for you not to respond,
since it will only continue to show up your ignorance.
I believe that you can do better than this, for i had seen you
in action before. I am clearly disappointed by this latest rant and
clouded judgement piece. It would only do more harm for your cause
than the support you envision for it is riddled with loopholes and
easily disputed.
1. It is true modern women are fully capable of bring up
children on their own, BUT only as long as they are still young,
able to earn a living or among the top 10-20% of the rich where she
needs not worry about money.
But had you considered the social stigma attached to children of
gays or lesbians, even on the assumption that they WANT children at
all? It would be cruel to do it to them, more so at such times when
the world is not fully prepared for same sex marriages, let alone
Singapore. Only a few states allowed such union. As the TS had
stated, perhaps in time it will change or worse, in time it may
not. Are we so cruel as to put children thru such forseeable
stigma?
2. There NEVER was an issue about me being approached by gay, of
fear of being raped by gays, or my posts written out of a
discrimination to gays. I had categorically stated their right to
live, but only that they should not promote or others encouraging
their un-natural lifestyles. See the flaw you made in your personal
tirade against me?
3. Traditions are never set in stone and I fully agree that it
should evolve with the times, just as societies grow and evolved.
But you must agree that gayism is still not approved by majority of
societies, or are not ready for such liberalism. It may come one
day, or it may not.
Yet, in your anger against me, you had clouded your judgement
and brought up past traditions that had already be removed and
accepted by majority of society. See you flaw caused by your
emotions against me?
4. Planet Earth had always been plagued by doomsayers and
selfish individuals who seeks to keep its resources to themselves
and not share it, using lies that there is not enough for all.
Fortunately, with the aid of science, we know now that we are
not facing any shortages or doom. We only need to be more
responsible with the husbandry of our resources, that's all.
Perhaps one day our resources will run out, but then i sincerly
doubt the progression of our scientific advancements cannot
improvise and adapt to such changes, just as humanity had adapted
for thousands of years. These are facts you cannot deny, for our
presence here today is the evidence of our progress.
BUT STILL, for all that i had written here, you had not
presented any convincing evidence or reasonable logic to
support your stance on gayism, unless your stance is similar to
mine, which then there is nothing we should be fighting against one
another, and keep your personal distate for me in other battle
fields of topic.
I await your response, but am fully prepared that you may
choosed to ignore me, which is your right. I had never in any
thread told anyone to 'shut up and sit down' even if is a
horrid personal attack on my being, for i believe we should
practise the freedom of speech beginning with ourself, with
rationality to foster better understanding.
