Will it not be more strategically intelligent for Hamas to
wage a political war then a military war ?
Which they already have, and won
in 2006. In the end, might is right in the world, regardless of
moral integrity.
What did they win in 2006 ?
Did they win a political war or even a military one over Israel
?
Instead, all they did was to split the Palestinian Community
into two - and weakening the Palestinian causes by their divisive
acts that saw their illegally usurping the authority from the
legitimately elected Palestinian Government of President Abbas.
All that the Palestinian had achieved by remaining in
the Hamas controlled Gaza Strip was to make themselves into a
pariah state that is ignored even by the other Arab States of
Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Morroco, Iraq,
and all other World Communities that support the Arab cause.
What victory are you dreaming about that occurred in 2006 ?
Presumbaly you got your information from
Osama ?
I didnt expect you to resort to
the kind of ad hominem attacks that xtreyier indulges. You have not
proved anything in the statement except the fact that you refuse to
look at information that is contrary to your
preconceptions.
For one who claim others for refusing to look at
information that is contrary to pre-conceptions - you seem to be
indulging in double standards that begin with you depending on
propaganda for your facts.
Is it not obvious from your circular arguments based on
flawed logic thinking - that you are fixated to the Hamas
cause and with you being affected by the Palestinian casualties
more then by the Principles of the Issues themselves ?
Israel had given the Palestinians time and warning to move
out of areas that they are planning to attack, and such
early warning could also serve as early notice for Hamas
to move out of the danger zones.
Then why would they bother giving
warnings if it could aid Hamas?
Surely, we can understand your position in not see
the obvious, as we can see that you are
more indulgent in Hamas agenda despite your claims to
neutrality.
Even if Hamas should take heed of the advance
warning made by Israel, it will already serve Israeli
objectives in neutralising Hamas positions - by emptying Hamas
personnels and destroying the infrastructure.
Even if they give warnings, the
rampant bombing of the Gaza Strip, where the Palestinians are
prevented from living is bound to result in heavy casualties
because of superior Israeli firepower (ie via the shockwaves and
structural damage to buildings). The casualties speak for
themselves:
Scoreboard for Gaza
invasion:
Palestinians dead: 780+
Palestinians injured:
3100+
Israeli deaths: 6 soldiers (4 by
friendly fire) and 4 civilians
Besides, there have already been
instances where Israel had deliberately bombed civilian
homes:
"The Israeli military may have committed war
crimes in Gaza, the UN's most senior human rights official
said tonight, as Israeli troops pressed on with their increasingly
deadly offensive in defiance of a UN security council resolution
demanding a ceasefire.
The scoreboard surely shows the unpreparedness of the Hamas
leadership to take advance construction of civilian
bomb shelters, stocking of food, water and energy, and
training for their civilians to respond to warning systems.
The scoreboard shows the irresponsibility of the Hamas
leadership to declare that rocket attacks will resume at the end of
the last negotiated truce period, even when throughout the truce
period there were no efforts to prepare the Palestinians for this
expected outcome.
Did Israel fire the first salvo immediately after the end of the
Truce on the last day of November 2008 ?
Even then Israel had only responded to the rocket and motar
attacks by returning fire to the points of origins of
the rocket and motar firing spots, and these were located
intentionally by the Hamas leadership in the middle of
dense Palestinian living areas.
It is easy to shout "War Crimes" - but wild rhetoric with fiery
sights then to blind the abilities to see facts on the ground.
If War Crimes are to be instituted, the Hamas leadership will be
the first to be dragged to stand trial - firstly for the
illegitimate overthrow of an elected Palestinian Government in the
Gaza Strip; secondly for the killing and imprisonment of duly
elected officials of the Palestinian Government for the Gaza Strip
under President Abbas; and third for the deliberate firing of
rockets and motar attacks into Israeli civilian residential areas,
schools, and public areas; and fourth for the contravening of the
Geneva Codes of War by using clearly designated neutral faclities
for the storage of weapons, ammunition and training of personnels
that included civilian homes, hospitals, religious sites, schools
and others.
Navi Pillay, the UN high
commissioner for human rights, singled out the killing this week of
up to 30 Palestinians in Zeitoun, south-east of Gaza City,
when Israel shelled a house where its troops had told about
110 civilians to take shelter.
Pillay, a former international
criminal court judge from South Africa, told the BBC the incident
"appears to have all the elements of war crimes".
She called for "credible, independent and transparent"
investigations into possible violations of humanitarian
law.
....
More than 750 Palestinians have
died since the start of the Israeli military operation.
More than half of Gaza's population are children, and the
Palestinian ministry of health said about 42% of the casualties
have been children.
Unicef said at least 100
children and minors were killed in the first 10 days of
fighting. The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, which
posts staff at hospitals to track casualties, put this number at
more than 160."
- UN levels war crimes warning at
Israel- http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/09/gaza-palestinians-israel-evacuees-zeitoun
My heart bleeds for the innocent lives loss, but it stops
bleeding for the hypocritical cries of those who support Hamas
deliberate and unprovoked acts of war on the innocent lives of
others.
Israel do not necessary need to prove that "might is right" -
and is clearly resorting to the Middle-eastern tradition upheld by
Islam's conservativism and fundamentalist religious practises in
the "Principle of an Eye for an Eye".
Clearly those outside of the Middle-eastern region do not
understand nor appreciate nor accept such value systems - does that
make anyone in the UN qualified to pass judgment as to what
constitute a War Crime ?
It will make you better off as a Singapore to be less involved
due to your lop sided understanding of Human Rights that is colored
by a lop sided Singapore humanities and value system.
Tell me that you are not one from the same religion of
these Palestinians - and perhaps I can begin to understand in
your position revealed from your clearly show of skewed
neutrality ?
Hamas do not need too much resources to wage an effective
media war, as the news chasing reporters are only too eager to
enter the war zone to report from the frontlines and to give
support to the supposed underdogs.
Unfortunately Israel has blocked
off the foreign media from entering Gaza even though a major
humanitarian crisis is precipitating in Gaza. I dont think it takes
a lot of effort to figure who has the upper hand in the media
war.
If as an outsider from that region of war, you can
"figure who has the upper
hand in the media war " - it already shows that you are
out-of-touch with the events on the ground with your biased
comments.
Western commentators are more resourceful then your own
narrow assumptions, as others who are more knowledgeable of
the events are already making shocking statements of their own that
‘Israel losing the media war’
So much for your expert views of the reality on the
ground.
How did the oil and gas suddenly appear in the headlines -
when decades have slipped by without a squeak of its existence
?
Decades? I already quoted
an article to say it was discovered in 2000 and how
the rights to the oil field were being negotiated between the
Israeli government, the PA and British oil firms. However,
since the ruin of the PA, the oil and natural gas was supposed to
fall under the ownership of Hamas. Naturally, Israel could not
allow that and hence, this MIGHT be one of the reason why
Israel has decided to invade Gaza, though they are plenty
others.
If the gas and oil exist, why will Hamas allow themselves
to be used as Iranian pawns to push Iranian agenda first, and put
their own Palestinian future on the back burner ?
After illegally usurping the authority over the Gaza Strip
from the legitimately elected government of President Abbas, why
did the Hamas leadership indulge themselves in the wasteful acts of
aggressions towards Israel - instead of developing their strengths
and stabilising their own future by exploiting the oil and gas
fields lying in the Gaza ?
With the oil and gas fields lying in abundance in the Gaza
Strip - as you have claimed - Hamas would have won the long
term strategic political battle over President Abbas PLA.
Clearly the publicity made about Israel's intention to grab the
Gaza Strip is nothing more then another speculative propaganda
developed by a bankrupt mind that depend on wild imagined
events.
When Israel withdraws from the Gaza Strip after completing
its various missions to discover and destroy all of Hama's
abilities to launch rockets and motars from the Gaza Strip - the
speculators will disingeneously develop another propaganda.