Uncertain,
1) After all that talk about FRS 10.8 I am surprise that you
didnt even use that to justify your arguement because isnt that the
first TOOL you pull out from to impress us?
2) So now my question to you is, how can you justify to IRAS to split
50% of the SP company's income (or Personal
income since its a SP company) with someone who never existed in
the company during that last financial year?
As you can see, after realising that he has no FACTS to support
what is said, he is now using what I call selective reading
technique to create something out of nothing. Isnt it obvious that
my statement about is talking about splitting 50%
of INCOME and not splitting shares.
And guess what, he is now using
the word STOCK, as if the Sole Proprietor company has
transform to be a public listed company....Kekeke..
If you are color blind and you cant read text written in black,
then I will forgive you for sprouting so much nonsense. However if
you are doing this hoping that we are blind, then I must say
that you are really pathatic.
So u like to pick on small mistake like stock split, then can u
tell me what is SP company's income hehe... Sole Proprietorship is
sole proprietorship, company is company. Company has stocks but
sole proprietorship dun, so I use stock split is kinda
reasonable.
Sadly, I am not colour-blinded. I think u are cos u still
refused to read my earlier post which I am too lazy to paste for u.
Apparently, whatever u insulted me like "u dun jump into
conclusion", "empty vessel" and "colour-blind" only apply to u.
To even bother to talk about FRS 10.8 (which u
claim i use to impress), U should first convince me why IRAS need
justification for ur so-called dun know stock or company income
split. (I said this 3 times liao)
