Ok.. O o O o apparently ur selective reading disorder has occurred
again.
This is your question right:
So now my question to you is, how can you justify to IRAS to split 50%
of the SP company's income (or Personal income since its a SP
company) with someone who never existed in the company during that
last financial year?
So my ans is:
U CLAIM IRAS NEEDS REASONS FOR
STOCK SPLITS... GIVE ME EVIDENCE TO SUBSTANTIATE UR
POINT.
Sorry hor, I won't stand by my com every sec for ur reply
ok, I got things to do... so dun quote people "Coward" when they
dun bother to pay attention to ur nonsense.
Uncertain,
1) After all that talk about FRS 10.8 I am surprise that you
didnt even use that to justify your arguement because isnt that the
first TOOL you pull out to impress us?
2) So now my question to you is, how can you justify to IRAS to split
50% of the SP company's
income (or Personal income since its a SP company)
with someone who never existed in the company during that last
financial year?
As you can see, after realising that he has no FACTS to support
what is said, he is now using what I call selective reading
technique to create something out of nothing. Isnt it obvious that
my statement about is talking about splitting 50%
of INCOME and not splitting shares.
And guess what, he is now using
the word STOCK, as if the Sole Proprietor company has
transform to be a public listed company....Kekeke..
If you are color blind and you cant read text written in black,
then I will forgive you for sprouting so much nonsense. However if
you are doing this hoping that we are blind, then I must say
that you are really pathatic.
TELL ME WHICH PART OF MY STATEMENT
TALK ABOUT STOCK OR SHARE SPLIT?
