Open Letter to Political Opposition Parties

last SG · 2008-05-21T04:23:24+00:00

Why waste a perfectly good song? *goes back to the popcorn*. Share some leh.

purpledragon84 SG

n u tink the opposition will not be profit motivated.. wow.. dun u noe by now utopia nvr existed..?

pls.. 5 or 10yrs after sdp or wp takes over, the same thing will float up..

qlqq9 SG

n u tink the opposition will not be profit motivated.. wow.. dun u noe by now utopia nvr existed..?

pls.. 5 or 10yrs after sdp or wp takes over, the same thing will float up..

like that, then who you suggest to run Singapore. Why dun u volunteer yourself?

purpledragon84 SG

i oso will corrupted and gian the money.. lol..

but its just ridiculous how u ppl sing to the tune of opposition and seem to refute that PAP ever did good.. of coz im not saying PAP gan zai or what.. but everytime somebody say PAP good, some idiots will go shouting dog dog dog..

we dun say who run singapore la.. every country in this world face corruption.. so i oso wun noe who run singapore best.. but the way the opposition is overhyped just makes it look ridiculous.. especially when they are really nothing remarkable..

maurizio13 SG

n u tink the opposition will not be profit motivated.. wow.. dun u noe by now utopia nvr existed..?

pls.. 5 or 10yrs after sdp or wp takes over, the same thing will float up..

That's why you need balance of power, where each party is constantly looking over the shoulder of the other party. Nobody can gain a majority advantage to do what they like.

maurizio13 SG

i oso will corrupted and gian the money.. lol..

In the past it was good, but these days, it has lost it's objective.

So right now, you are saying that P4P is corrupted?

qlqq9 SG

i oso will corrupted and gian the money.. lol..

so do you think pap is corrupted?

maurizio13 SG

so do you think pap is corrupted?

I thought he already said "every country in this world face corruption.. so i oso wun noe who run singapore best.. ".

qlqq9 SG

I thought he already said "every country in this world face corruption.. so i oso wun noe who run singapore best.. ".

I suggest he runs Singapore. ha ha ha

purpledragon84 SG

so do you think pap is corrupted?

y not? of coz i think it may be.. just remember what PM say abt GIC's disclosure level.. and like i said, PAP or not, all sux..

but that oso means oppo-supporters should shut up abt how bad pap is, until they have proven how good their own parties are, and stop labeling pap supporters as dogs.. how uncouth... u dun see obama supporters screaming clinton supporters dogs and lackeys.. and vice versa, except a few losers..

qlqq9 SG

y not? of coz i think it may be.. just remember what PM say abt GIC's disclosure level.. and like i said, PAP or not, all sux..

hello, may I know how old are you? So you are telling me there should not be freedom of speech in singapore. People should just be doormat and allow PAP to do as they please?

maurizio13 SG

y not? of coz i think it may be.. just remember what PM say abt GIC's disclosure level.. and like i said, PAP or not, all sux..

But opposition is still an unknown, whereas the other is a confirmed variable.

You can't just chop off all the trees with one single blow. If person A is a thief, it does not mean person B is a thief.

purpledragon84 SG

again.. u all take words too literally..when i say shut up.. i dun mean let them trample..

u look at speakers corner threads.. which one dun have "despots", "dogs", "LKY MUST DIE"? all this will let ppl have a better understanding of our political scene now?

u want to let ppl understand what the hell is wrong with singapore now, u post the facts that they delibrately miss out, and let ppl do the judging.. adding ur own comments to it will only serve to let ppl tink that u are a biased and inaccurate source.. surely even YOU should know that..

qlqq9 SG

again.. u all take words too literally..when i say shut up.. i dun mean let them trample..

u look at speakers corner threads.. which one dun have "despots", "dogs", "LKY MUST DIE"? all this will let ppl have a better understanding of our political scene now?

84, so you are 24, now I understand why you say what you said.

purpledragon84 SG

But opposition is still an unknown, whereas the other is a confirmed variable.

You can't just chop off all the trees with one single blow. If person A is a thief, it does not mean person B is a thief.

but the problem with some ppl in this forum is that they try to make it sound like person B is NOT a thief just because A is..

if u find what i said weird, take a look at SC again..

purpledragon84 SG

84, so you are 24, now I understand why you say what you said.

haha.. by ur concept, u are 9 this year..

Point_blank SG

to piont_blankie,

before you go off.

should a contractor who is paid world rec, tasked to solve a problem

ask the hand that feeds its mouth

"hey, you have a problem that u engaged me (at extreme high price) to solve,

but I no no. You know the solution or not?"

now f off!

to unbalanced_complacencies

Show me where the specific contractor who is paid as you claimed asked for a solution

Who the hell are you to tell me to f off. you fake democratic asswipe. But i wont descend to your level, you balanced_piece_of_shit. Do stay and show your hypocrisy.

eagle SG

Ask the incumbent to release the results of any gerrymandering way before an election is due. Mega-GRCs are already an unfair practice.

Why support PAP yet nothing to comment on this unfair practice de

Hmmm...

Point_blank SG

TS has nothing to say about this unfair practice?

Eagle, did i propose such measures? Wasn't it put to the citizens and through a vote, such measures were accepted by the majority? Before the elections, did the opposition did anything constructive successfully to change the citizen's mind? Can you accept the decision by the majority?

So who to blame? The majority or the ineffective whinning opposition parties, and their supporters such as Atobe and Mariozio13, whom seemed to talk big and alot, but no positive actions.

You think my silence to your question is fear? Think again, eagle. I only kept quiet because i thought you had a brain between the ears and could figure it out yourself, but i guess i was wrong. Thus my reply. May it satisfy your cerebral tissues, if there are any

Point_blank SG

Double post.

eagle SG

So who to blame? The majority or the ineffective whinning opposition parties, and their supporters such as Atobe and Mariozio13, whom seemed to talk big and alot, but no positive actions.

Fact: Since the introduction of mega-GRCs, the opposition have never won a GRC.
Fact: The incumbent has only 66.6% of the votes, yet have 82/84 seats. Majority indeed.

There was no vote on the implementation of mega-GRCs (5~6 persons). Voting for a government is different from voting for the implementation of the mega-GRC. Just the previous election, we see MM Lee in his mega 6 person GRCs leading 5 greenhorns who would most likely not stand a chance against a number of the opposition candidates. The same for GCT.

The other example that they did was 'voting' to join Malaysia. In none of the choices was there one that allows the population to vote no. The opposition wanted a 'NO' and they weren't given a choice. A blank vote was stated in the clause to be a 'yes'. They did raised reasons why it wasn't good, but even if their arguments were accepted by the majority, the majority weren't given a chance at all to vote for 'no' at all. What happened eventually? Singapore still broke away from Malaysia.

« Previous Page Next Page »