You seem to be hasty and
incomplete in the things that you do, and jump to conclusions too
quickly. You should learn to be more circumspect in so quickly
expressing your thoughts.
Did you find the solutions finally
after reading and extracting one paragraph from my posts
?
For a little while you confirmed
my suspicion that you are blind, and choose to see only what you
wish to see.
Are you certain that petrol prices
will ever become cheaper ?
Consumption can be curbed not by
indiscriminately increasing the prices on a blanket basis that
hurts the essential services that need petrol or industrial oil,
which in turn affect the overall Cost of Living.
Electronic Road Pricing can be
fine tuned to discourage the intensive use of saloon cars, and
solve your concerns of petrol consumption for leisure - while
commercial goods vehicles can be priced lower that do not affect
transportation cost normally passed to consumer through product
pricing.
The selective use of Road Pricing
is to be differntiated with the arbitrary and indiscriminate
pricing currently implemented, which result in the ERP system being
a Revenue Generating Mechanism for the Government.
With or without local consumer
demand, World Petroleum Prices will continue to spiral
upwards, as the supply of petrol is finite, and is a depleting
resource - which is manipulated as a speculative commodity by
Oil Companies.
Why should Governments continue to
use an inflexible tax system to moderate consumption, when there
are more effective means that focus on specifics without producing
negative effects generally to the Cost of Living ?.
How would you even know if any
solution are well thought out proposals, if you do not make
any effort to even understand the structure of the proposal
?
It is always easy to opt out and
allow the academics and / or professionals to exercise thinking -
what happened to your own intellectual faculties ?
How will you know if Ah Meng is
not more intelligent then your 'Point_blank' approach that have
time and again led your points being exposed as blanks
?
At this stage, I am no longer
surprise by your very presumptious and condescending remarks
towards participants in this Speakers' Corner.
If you are not willing to engage
but prefer to indulge in polemics - why do you even bother to be
here ?
If you believe that accountability
is zero, continue with your Point_blank approach in your debating
style, and see how far you get in this forum.
You got to make up your
mind which is more important - your ''responsibility to
society'' or to personal vanity.
Why should you even care
if your good solution is plagiarised by any thick skinned shameless
academics - if it benefits society at large ?
Has this not been the position of
CSJ in publicising his thoughts and solutions that he believe are
good alternatives in his book ''Dare to Change'' ?
The MIW dismissed his writings as
''western liberal thinking'' when it was released to the public in
the 1990s; yet some of the policy changes in the Year 2002 were
parallel ideas resembling CSJ's solutions published ten years
earlier.
During the preceding ten years
that CSJ's proposal was dismissed, at least one generation of
Singaporeans have to endure the selfish insanity of the MIW
Government in office between 1992 and 2002.
With your expertise in insulting
yourself so far, why do you need any extra help from me ?
Are you sure that you care for only answers from
anyone, or only the answers that you want to see or hear
?
You can take as much time as you
want to cop out from this debate, as no one will miss your
absence.
Atobe, I had offered a reconciliatory handout and
this was again your polemic responses. Fine.
"You seem to be hasty and
incomplete in the things that you do, and jump to conclusions too
quickly. You should learn to be more circumspect in so quickly
expressing your thoughts.
Did you find the solutions finally
after reading and extracting one paragraph from my posts
?
For a little while you confirmed
my suspicion that you are blind, and choose to see only what you
wish to see"
Yes. I was blinded for i wish to see a
reconciliation, that the opposition are indeed working for
solutions to solve the everyday issues of the citizens. But by your
admittance that it is not, I had been BLINDED by the OPPOSITION
once again.
"Are you certain that petrol
prices will ever become cheaper ?
Consumption can be curbed not by
indiscriminately increasing the prices on a blanket basis that
hurts the essential services that need petrol or industrial oil,
which in turn affect the overall Cost of Living.
Electronic Road Pricing can be
fine tuned to discourage the intensive use of saloon cars, and
solve your concerns of petrol consumption for leisure - while
commercial goods vehicles can be priced lower that do not affect
transportation cost normally passed to consumer through product
pricing.
The selective use of Road Pricing
is to be differntiated with the arbitrary and indiscriminate
pricing currently implemented, which result in the ERP system being
a Revenue Generating Mechanism for the Government.
With or without local consumer
demand, World Petroleum Prices will continue to spiral
upwards, as the supply of petrol is finite, and is a depleting
resource - which is manipulated as a speculative commodity by
Oil Companies.
Why should Governments continue to
use an inflexible tax system to moderate consumption, when there
are more effective means that focus on specifics without producing
negative effects generally to the Cost of Living ?.
How would you even know if any
solution are well thought out proposals, if you do not make
any effort to even understand the structure of the proposal
?"
You don't seem to read anyone's
else words, except your own. Re-read my post. Did i say i challenge
your assumptions on such issues? You, as an OPPOSITION PARTY
SUPPORTER, FAILED to listen to others yet
again.
"It is always easy to opt out and
allow the academics and / or professionals to exercise thinking -
what happened to your own
intellectual faculties ?"
Good
lord! Is this how the opposition party thinking policy is run?
Without professionals and/ or academics? Running a country is not
the same as running a hawker stall! "what happened to your
own intellectual faculties" - would you trust an
engineer to perform accounting roles without trainning for it? or a
teacher to run the Defence Department?
Enough of engaging with a complete
idiot that you are, i say! A waste of my time and my
efforts!
Go
and fool others. I would like to see how many will be taken in
by your crap.
I
would rather hear what others say on this thread.
