The natural instinct of sex is heterosexual.If a man is
attracted to another man, probably the man he is attracted to look
more feminine.As a parent,surely one should expalain to his child
that attraction to the same sex person is not for sex.He should
tell his child to look for opposite sex partner.So that is a reason
why homo is wrong.
Tat just means u don't understand them at all 
U r a guy right ? U like girls right ? Now
imagine u r a girl and u like girls as much as u now.
Furthermore, u r accusing all homosexuals' parents give poor
upbringing and poor parenting and they end up as homosexual. I
think tat is a baseless senseless accusation.
Homosexual, according to many studies, r inborn. I think u need to
read tat statement again. Homosexual, according to many studies, r
inborn. They r born to like people of the same sex. Nothing to do
with parents or watsoever
The very fact that hold that chewing is not banned show that I
do not swallow information wholesale. I arrive at my stand by my
own reasonings.
U mean u arrive at the wrong conclusion using your own
reasoning. How do u know u r not wrong on the homosexual issue
?
Scientific report found in the internet. Which are not
conclusive, and are probably, may, most likely, many other factors,
tend to etc. They report what is seen, and do not say definitely: "
Gays will be left handed."
Doctors examining the cells of a foetus and find an extra
chromosone, can conclude that the child will have Down Syndrome,
but no such certainity for gays.
Do you have your own experiments, your own study? I don't.
I don't swallow information wholesale, and you have proof of
that.
Ok, lets say the studies r not conclusive. Tat means gays maybe
inborn. Since u cannot prove it to be wrong, then why r u punishing
them by forcing them to remain single and lonely ? Given the
benefit of doubt, we should practise tolerance and not
discrimination. A person is innocent unless proven guilty. Why is
tis good ? Because we rather jail 100 less criminals than jail one
innocent person.
You again present you errorneous view of Sect. 337A. That, as I
have said it is not a piece of legislation banning gays in
Singapore.
If you run foul of that law, you will be punished because you run
foul of the law. Whether you are gay or not the question does not
arise..
So u expect gays to remain single and not have sex for their
whole life for your sake ? If they did the act, whether private or
public,they commit the offence 377A. Isn't tat wat 377A is about
?
person has sexual urges, and will seek gratification. Some with
shoes, some by voyeurism, animals, children, self, panties, and
what not. So it is not surprising that some can only get their
kicks with the same sex. This as with the rest, I say is a
perversion
Prove it. I have been challenging u for many occasions on tis.
Otherwise u r just using your own reasoning and looking at history,
it can be wrong. Remember... U r wrong before. Why should everybody
believe in the wrong thing or something someone thought ? U think I
thought who confirm. How credible is tat ?
I said homosexuals having same sex weddings with white gowns and
wedding marches, are a sign that they want normalcy, which inturn
shows that they know that they are queers. Same for the human
rights issues, and sexual orientation explanation. They know that
they are abnormal.
Why does wanting to be normal = u r queer ? U mean u wanna marry
wearing singlet and slipper ? If u wanna marry with a suit and tie
and gowns, tat means u want to be normal too and tat = u r queer ?
Sorry man, people in society follow the norm now and then and
following it does not means u r queer, but rather normal.
