Read carefully what PRP actually said
Just tell me which part of my conclusion is wrong 
There are many studies, and these studies are by people who are
through. They think its the brain size, they think it is genetics,
they think it is upbringing, they think it is the number of elder
male siblings, they think it is population density, they think it
is normal ( because some animals to exhibit such traits) What ever
they think of it cannot be conclusively proven. And it stand
because it cannot be conclusively disproven. Most biological
avenues have been probed, cells, DNA, dexterity, blood samples,
penis size, armpit smell and what else. These are not conclusive,
because in the early stages of the study they reveal a common
thread, but further studies with a larger pool of subjects, the
theory does not hold.
So you have to decide yourself. That is what I am asking you. What
you think. Present it here. Tell us.
I already told u. The result is inconclusive. And tat is why we
should give them the benefit of the doubt. I have stated tis point
many times and u simply ignore them.
Paedophile what are they? Would you have any problem with them
being perverts, a deviation?
I have problem with paedophile because they harm children. Now
wat is your problem with homosexual ?
Homosexuality is a perversion, and it does not need medical or
psychological treatment as long as it is between consenting adults
and does not cause harm to any of the parties.
I have stated many times. Prove it. Otherwise on wat grounds do
u have to say it is a perversion and not a natural thing ?
It is not against gays, but against lewd acts between men, any
men. It is also against pimping.
Again where there is no complaint, there is no action. This refers
to the in private part.
I really hope you can understand the in public part.
Did u read the words carefully ? Let me explain in simple
english for u
Any male person who,
= A male person (lesbian is not included)
in public or private,
= it is an offense whether u do it privately or
publicly
commits, or abets the commission of, or procures or attempts to
procure the commission
= know or willingly and acts or attempt to commit
by any male person of, any act of gross indecency with another male
person,
= any sexual act such as oral or anal
shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to
2 years.
= can be caught and jailed.
So It literally means any man who have sex with another man,
whether he do it openly or in his bedroom, is a jailable offence.
Now u interprete the law for me in plain english and tell me where
do u get the idea of pimping ?
Now u say tat if no one complaint, then there is no action. Isn't
tat the same for all offences ? If u
murder/rape/rob/cheat/beat/molest someone, and no one complains,
authorities do not know, then no actions r done to u too. Isn't tat
the classic SAF law ? U can do anything u want, but don't get
caught.
I believe in male and female marriages. And all the presumptions
that go with it. That is my belief, and I am not afraid to be
wrong.
U have your right to your belief but take note u shouldn't force
your belief down other people throat.
How things are done is the concern of the community. Peoples
customs is not to be made a mockery of by others. I will be
appalled, as will be many others, if a person of one faith marries
according to the rites of another faith just to demonstrate some
rights or personal freedom. Gays should not have attempted same sex
marriages. They should have done something else. I suggested a
personal contract. They can very well invent something .
Well in singapore same sex marriage is still not allowed, and it
is not about a law tat is against homosexual marriage but
homosexual itself. If u want to ban a law prohibiting them to
marry, then I will have lesser things to say. But u r forcing them
to live a life of calibracy. Tat is ridiculous
The Americans are very creative, they came up with terms like
gay for homosexuals. And 'Ho' for prostitutes. Now we can't use the
word gay for happy, and Santa Claus is wondering whether to use the
traditionsl 'Ho Ho Ho' greeting this Christmas season.
How they marry is everybodys' concern.
Com'on... if u want to be fussy, "come" is also wrong and 69 is
a funny number. But u have digress isn't it ?
This thread is about homosexual propagating their cause, and not
enough is being done to oppose this trend. Gay marriages is a
battle in the war.
From the other side of the fence, I see the opposite. I see many
religious people battling and propagating their cause and not
enough is done to oppose tis trend.
