Women had to fight for equal rights because they were truly
discriminated. No suffrage till the 20th century, social and
cultural discrimination.
But are gays discriminated here? Are they boycotted? Are they
beaten up? Are they denied constitutional rights?
They r discriminated because there is an unfair and absurb law
banning homosexual from having sex while people of the opposite sex
can do the same thing.
And if u say the law does not work, then why force the law to exist
?
Dont make it sound like you guys are so noble trying to fight
for gay equality. Are you even a gay yourself?
The attitude of straights is even worse. To argue for something
which doesn't even concern them.
They must be thinking all the gays are living in depression because
they can't have sex legally. So poor thing, must fight equality for
them.
I don't see why u want to ask tis question. I am not a gay, but
I do not like to see people discriminate others and see injustice
done. If u see an old granny gonna get cheated, will u do nothing
because u do not know her ? R u the type tat like to watch people
get robbed on the streets and do nothing ?
Singapore.
And how have u help singapore ? IS singapore gonna sink because
377A is absent ?
The issue is not whether sodomy is wrong but whether our society
is ready to accept homosexual lifestyle.
Their lifestyle has nothing to do with u when they do it
privately
Seriously you think those religious people care about the
prohibition in 377A? Will the repeal of 377A see a huge surge in
the no. of private sodomy acts?
Then why do u wanna force the law to exist ? U want to make the
legal system here as a joke ?
Using your logic, then the heterosexuals here must have suffered
greatly compared to the citizens in more liberal countries, when
377 was still around.
Then they look into the law and remove 377 isn't it ?
But isn't this what the govt is doing .. leaving them alone?
The problem is the religious guys
If these people so powerful, then maybe we won't have IR
liao
Com'on la... IR have a diferent impact compared with tis. These
religious people have wielded enough power to make the gov form an
awkward position in the penal code. Aren't they powerful enough as
it is ?
And it is not only religious people who are against it. Many
older folks find it hard to accept also, and they are not really
religious people.
They r not making much noises because frankly wat gays do in
private has no impact in their lives.
If I'm not wrong,377A is not about sodomy.It is about soliciting
for gey sex
U r wrong. It is about sodomy. Please go and read carefully
before posting
The govt doesn't want them to get AIDS.So the govt is so
good,they still want to complain.That's why the job of the govt is
very difficult.The attitude of geys is strange & inmature.
U r talking rubbish here. U think everyone is like small kids
and have to have a daddy looking after u and banning u from doing
tis and tat. Furthermore, there r gays who r faithful to their
partner and there r married people who r promiscuous. Why only
target homosexual ?
If geys want to reinstate S377,i have no objection.Do geys
really want it?
Tis is stupid. Give me a reason why they don't want to.
When your son like another boy,please tell him: Sex is
heterosexual.One can like a same sex person but one shouldn't have
sexual relationship with a same sex person.You can be a very good
& close friiend with him but not having sexual relatinship.You
should look for a gilt as sexual partner.U should have sex after
marriage.
If things r tat simple, then there is no gays in the world. Oh
ya hor... u don't believe gays exists. No wonder u make such a
silly comment
I accept geys as any other human beings.Do u know that?
Let me see, u felt gays r socially inept and cannot find
girlfriends and resort to homosexual, u felt homosexual r
promiscuous, u think they have bad parents and taught them the
wrong thing, u think they r crazy to fu k people asshole. Ok, u
don't accept gays as any other human beings.
