The point is, if the repurcussions are as serious as you say,
then why did these two countries not make it illegal?
I push my point further .. do you see legions of deformed babies
from these two countries from incest birth? Why?
I never claim tat the end result is drastic. As said, the
reasoning why homosexual is allowed while incest is not is due to
the fact tat incest is a choice while homosexual is inborn. So far,
u have been ignoring the point and attack from an angle which I
never mention 
I think u r the
one with pathetic argument
Exactly! So those who wanna go into incest should think twice
before doing it! But then, who is to STOP THEM from doing it? The
law?
And why has tat got to do with homosexual Incest can form
deformed babies while AIDS patient can give babies with AIDs. And
wat child canhomosexual produced ? U have been lumping homosexual
and incest together but they have little in common. Why don't u
prove to me tat homosexual is the same as incest first ?
His argument defending the incest law is pathetic
Your argument on putting incest is pathetic ba. U never seek to
clarify why u put incest as the same as homosexual.
