Why can't you answer my question decisively? Why do you make
unnecessary elaboration that doesn't answer my question?
NO. Because
Homosexual is still better than incest. Furthermore, homosexual is
inborn. And lastly, u r just talking about a completely
hypothetical case whereby homosexual is a choice. I list down why
incest is worse than homosexual
Read the word in bold. Is tat not decisively enough ? Why can't i
elaborate on my answer 
Now how about my question for u, which u
continuously avoid ? Why r u afraid to answer ?
Now why don't u list why homosexual should be banned ? I
don't see u giving any reasons why homosexual should be
banned.
Now you are comparing them on the basis of which is better. So
the better one you support, the worse one you boo boo.
Though u say it in a discriminating way, tis is the fact of the
world Murder is more serious than
hurting people. Tat is why the punishment is more severe. Tell me,
why do u think it is funny
Similary you have argued that sex with AIDS people per se should
NOT be criminalised but sex with your close relations should be. On
the basis of your unfounded assumption that babies with AIDS are
not as damaging as children from incestuous birth.
I have already stated tat people with closer bloodline have
higher chances of defective children. I think denying it is silly.
Looking at evidence, u cannot give me the section for incest law as
well. If u give me the section, i give u the evidence how ? Answer
the below question as well. U just ignore them again
DO u accept incest give an additional problem of defective
children ? Why don't u answer tis question first ? And if u look at
homosexual, than incest give an additional problem to homosexual
and tat makes homosexual to be better than incest. Since homosexual
is better than incest, than why compare the 2 together
?
So you are saying we should criminalise people who become monks,
priests or nuns?
Tat depend on why do u want to criminised homosexual
If it is not fool proof, rightly so, then shouldn't sex with
AIDS people be criminal as well? After all, you have a choice
whether to have sex with a clean woman or a dirty woman.
tat is why i say aids patient should inform their partner before
having sexual intercourse.
You notice I'm trying to get them to recognize the private
rights argument, but they keep using the argument that homo is
inborn while incest is not to defend the existence of our incest
laws.
How come? When we were discussing about homosexuality only, they
happily throw out the thousand and one reasons why homo laws should
not exist. Then when I talk about incest, they couldnt come out
with any good reason why incest laws should exist.
I don't see why u r qualified to state tis conclusion. U r no
different from PRP. U avoid questions ask to u then give a broad
conclusion when all u did is refuse to answer question and treat
all other people comment as invalid. The only thing u r good at is proclaming u
r winning when in actual fact u just avoiding and giving bad
examples
