onceinabluemoon SG Another good point Only politicians that enact "official secret acts" and not those that enact "freedom of information act" Still, the internet readership is rather low. There is also no editor to separate the chaff from the wheat.
Hogzilla SG Everybody is an editor of what they read, they should have the maturity to separate the chaff from the wheat. Besides, this editor is may not be subjective too. If that's the case, what is the difference between this editor and 146th?
onceinabluemoon SG Not everyone is qualified to be an editor. Sure editors may be subjective... that is why there are acknowledged blue blood papers and papers recognised as government mouth pieces. Many prefer that a paper vet the "facts" before the article see daylight, saving them the trouble of fact-checking.
onceinabluemoon SG Not everyone is qualified to be an editor. Sure editors may be subjective... that is why there are acknowledged blue blood papers and papers recognised as government mouth pieces. Many prefer that a paper vet the "facts" before the article see daylight, saving them the trouble of fact-checking. OMG they are still fighting about the casino here