Originally posted by BillyBong:
Why do you continue to insist on the speculative route? It has not
happened yet, so why assume? Why berate the person at the center
when you know next to nothing about him? (as you yourself admitted)
You're just going round in circles.
Speculative route, well ain't you guilty of it as well?
Likewise you are speculating
that he will be coming back to serve. I did not assume, I am just
taking a pragmatic point of view. So in a nutshell, can you ensure
that he comes back to serve. Until you can provide a definitive
answer to that question, I guess it is still the million dollar
question. Whose head should roll when that happen?
Originally posted by BillyBong:
You didn't have to directly make the comparison or pay disparity
between the music and 'others' sector. The insinuation was obvious.
Too bad you enjoy stagnation over change. People like you will
never understand what others see in music.
Again you assume that I am making obvious insinuation. For a
moment, why don't you look around in Singapore and name me a couple
of classical musician who have make it good in Singapore. None that
I can recall. This is a fact not an assumption. You are right that
I don't see arty-farty music in the same light as you, I am an old
boor (as mentioned in my previous post). I don't appreciate music
in the same way you don't appreciate the need for personel to
maintain the operational capability of SAF.
Originally posted by BillyBong:
For someone who served NS, you seem to know nothing about war,
despite your self-declared selfishness. In war you learn to trust
yourself and the comrades in the next foxhole, regardless of their
character or past history. No one should practice the luxury of
selective aid on a battlefield. Too bad you think otherwise,
especially against deferment-personnel.
If in war that I need to fight in a foxhole, that means we have
lost. I don't fight at that level. When I am in no man's land, I
trusted my team more than I can trust the violin plucker. I have
nothing against deferment if it is officially allowed. Why bend the
rules again when it has been stated that no deferment is
entertained. If you allowed deferment to violin plucker, it must
also be allowed to others who need it more genuinely. For example,
what about a young father who has to take care of his family and
need time to settle them in good hands before he serve NS less
important than violin plucker's music education? I am selfish, then
what about violin plucker? Isn't he as selfish to want to get his
music education first over the defense of this country? 
Originally posted by BillyBong:
You speak as if the world should revolve around Singapore and not
the other way around. That is unfortunately typical of people
nowadays. Curtis does not owe us a place and it is entirely up to
their administration if they choose to 'bend the rules' to
accomodate someone, the same way our administration treats Ike's
request. I do agree that schools do not necessarily make the
student, but using that as an excuse is just cheaply marginalising
his opportunity and the school's gracious offer.
Hell why not recommend the Laselle-SIA college of the
arts?
Does the world revolve around Singapore? Oh gosh, when did that
happen? Oh right when you assume that I thought it does happen.
Curtis does not owe us a place, so
does SAF which don't owe violin plucker an entertainment to defer.
There are so many good music schools around the world, why can't he
apply for them after he served? If he is good enough, then he
should reapply for a scholarship. The reason is legitimate, so what
is wrong with that? Among them, there will be one which will be
able to offer the quality music education violin plucker so craves
for.
I would recommend Laselle-SIA college of the arts. Why not?
