For all you know, after he goes there (be it before or after
serving), he could jolly well not be coming back. Afterall, at the
moment, with a music qualifications, what can he do in Singapore?
There are more opportunities in the west for him. While most of us
probably won't lose any sleep regardless of what age he enlisted,
but it definitely caused a lot of disatisfaction that the law have
been bent once more.
Many of us who have served also have good memories. Why should
we be helping him defend his love ones here when he is plucking his
violin string over there when he has not served? In this aspect, I
admit I am selfish, I am not gracious enough to offer my head for a
bullet that is intended for his family in times of war. Will
someone like to offer his instead? If we are to develop towards a
better society, then rules should be followed. Why can't he go and
pluck his violin strings after NS. If he is really that good, he
should ask the Singapore Government to award him a scholarship even
if he has to give the current one up.
When I put on my uniform, I defend what is dear to me, that is
my family and friends. Most of us served our time, expecting the
next generation to follow in our footstep to defend this land. I do
not possess such a noble thought of protecting someone's family
while he plucked his violin strings elsewhere.
All we are asking for is fairness. If the law is there to serve the
purpose, why should somebody be allowed to bend it so that it can
help nuture this 'talent'? What about people who due to family
problems need to ask for deferment and not allowed? Is it fair to
this group of people? Does it mean the daily lives of this group of
people is less important than violin boy's music studies?
