lets put the facts correct before dicuss.
more news fr pap machine,so u said
pl post more reliable info here.lets hear your stories
Gomez said he was distracted that he had tot he had submitted the
minority form.
Why after few days and numerous shells fr pap then he
restore his memory?
pl read what DPM Wong statement on Gomez.of course,
if u dunt diccuss issue based on facts,then no need to read.
do u buy what wp said?what did they say?
Workers' Party chairman Ms Sylvia Lim has a
duty
to confirm or deny what Gomez said.G said when he submitted the
form,
Lim was with him.The CCTV proved she was not.
Lim,as a lawyer and lectuer,sure know what are the
implications
from her confirmation,if any, or from her denial,if any, of Gomez
statement.
Gomez used her as witness that he did submit the form.
What are the reasonable conclusion that she ,so far,has
not denied that she did witness Gomez's submission.
PENAL
CODE
(CHAPTER 224)
CHAPTER XXII
CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION, INSULT AND ANNOYANCE
Criminal intimidation.
503. Whoever threatens another with any injury to his person,
reputation or property, or to the person or
reputation of any one in whom that person is interested, with
intent to cause alarm to that person, or to cause that person to do
any act which he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do any
act which that person is legally entitled to do, as the means of
avoiding the execution of such threat, commits criminal
intimidation.
..............
Punishment for criminal intimidation. If threat is to cause death
or grievous hurt, etc.
506. Whoever commits the offence of criminal intimidation shall be
punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2
years, or with fine, or with both;.........
Mr(DPM) Wong says: "Is Mr Gomez saying that he intended to file
the form on 24 April but mistakenly omitted to do so because there
was too much distraction? And if this is his explanation for not
submitting the form on 24 April, we still are none the wiser about
Mr Gomez's behaviour two days later which he apologised for without
offering an explanation.
"Was he still distracted on 26 April when he found the time to go
to the ELD to ask for his minority certificate and there not only
demanded that the ELD staff check again but also warned the ELD
officer of consequences?
"When the ELD called him back to clarify what actually happened,
was Mr Gomez still distracted and still intending to obtain the
certificate and therefore still had not realised that he had not
filed it?"
ok,what else gomez or wp says then?
