The Cantonese says hao soi tuo guo cha, yr saliva more than yr
tea. No wonder until today nothing happen. 
Oh, I thought you were questioning if Ngyuen is indeed guilty of
drug trafficking, with yr statement like 400 g of drugs is flimsy
evidence for drug trafficking
.the judge could be making a mistake,
the unfairly stacked against the defending lawyer
and you speak
from the perspective of drug lords, and you highlighted the motives
of the accused, I can only conclude that to you, drug trafficking
is part of a business and Ngyuen is only a presumed trafficker
and he is a trafficker only because he offered aid to the
Australian Police. It is alright you ridicule our judicial system,
but you have failed in proving why a convicted drug trafficker
should not face death penalty, or have I missed out anything?
3) Stan Forbes' letter self-contradicts. His stand is
pretty inconsistent, although it appears to be consistent. But
usually, vocal minority indicates some other ppl?
They are pretty inconsistent, although it appears to be
consistent. What kind of argument is that? 
Forbes did not contradict himself, he only spoke what you dont
want to hear.
Another Australia spoke up today, Mr. Jonathan Ariel of New South
Wales, said Countless Australians have disgraced themselves in
attacking Singapore
our most civilized neighboring state.
I dont know about the vocal minority in Australia, but I do know
who are the vocal minority in Singapore, those who think saying
something is doing something.
4) perhaps, you should look more carefully at our law
regarding foreign counsels.
I cant read, please tell me.
5)
. Nonetheless, by the accused own offered aid to the
Australian Police, he was a trafficker
.
He was convicted the court of law in Singapore for trafficking,
not because he offered to the Australian Police?
6) No comment. (Please look at the entire post before
making such tautologies.)
Why did you say that someone (say a honkee) is extremely
gullible, and is likely to be TAKEN as guilty in Singapore? Surely
you can explain what you said without using words like
tautologies (belly qim, nin be lia bo). 
7) Check Amnesty International's report "Singapore: A
Hidden Toll of Executions".
Long story, no time to read, what is yr point?
9)
.I'm not a die-hard. hey, I changed my stance from
retentionist to abolitionist after all...
hehehehe, I changed from abolititionist to
retentionist
.
10) Burmese MNC.
Like that all rice farmers are CEO of MNC. If you are discussing
drug trafficking in general, how can drug lords in Myanmar be
responsible for the abuses of drugs such as ecstasy pills? Hmm
.we
are not talking about the same thing.
11) I am baffled by your logic here. Oh, I see it now;
But why are you so frenetic over the word "blame"?
Hehehe
blame everybody except himself for the crime he
committed. Very normal for those who dont admit making
mistakes.
12) Well, I'm giving you the perception of the
druglords, not my perception. Once again, you can question this,
but remember: it's not my opinion,
I din know that a drug lord talking through you. Why should I or
anybody should care about what a drug lord says?? except when we
want to go to war with him. Wrong channel.
14) I'm not ignorant of the problem. I am just trying to
point out to you: if your/my child (if I have one in the future
anyway) chooses to buy drugs, he will still buy drugs no matter how
many drug peddlars you shoot dead.
you could save money on
purchasing illegal guns to shoot people who may be in as dire a
state as your child, or possibly even worse.
Oh man, now *I* pity YOUR child.
A child will not buy drug if nobody peddle to him, he will not
buy drug if he is not addicted to it
. There are many reasons why a
child, especially teenagers ended up in drug. Teaching only is
useful for those who only speak, the greater responsibility of the
parents and the society in general is to create an environment that
is free from illegal drugs and drug abuses, making the availability
of such drug difficult is one key and important measure.
Irresponsible are parents who say that after all s/he has
the choice whether to buy the drug or not. Sad are those
whose parents who think that After all, the peddler is not
the one who consumes the drug; it is your child who does.
Sounds familiar? 
Why do you pity MY child??
Here is what LKY says, quoted by Mr. Jonathan Ariel from Australia,
In legislation, our priority is the security and well-being of the
law-abiding citizens rather than the right of the criminal to be
protected from incriminating evidence. Not many ppl like LKY, and
I certainly dont like many of the things he did and said, but this
one represents my position.
Have a drug free week end.
