Originally posted by tspg:
Letters from the public who has raised concern and opposition to
certain policies have been published before. The articles written
by ex-civil servant Ngiam were not exactly pro-govt either. The
opposition wards decision not to raise S & C charges was also
reported in the papers.
yes yes yes... and were we not talking about independent
investigative journalism? a few complaints and
opinion pieces in the forum page does not make a free press.
also, one might add that SPH reserves the rights to edit before
publishing anything contributed by the public. how much of what is
published is really unadulterated freedom ?
Changes takes time. I do feel that there has been an increase in
the diversity in views and sources. It takes two hand to clap. The
public must dare to voice their views if they want to be heard.
When you see reporters looking for people to interview, ppl always
siam. Then in private they complain no freedom of speak.
what is the point of entertaining a press they do not trust and
respect? time? how long are u willing to wait? till hell freezes
over?
There are policies changes due to public feedback also, such as
Chek Jawa. The public need to play its part and give good feedback
too. Lets just hope that this happen more often in future.
how cool... we have issues of terrorism, political transparency,
structural unemployment, and many, many other issues worth talking
about...
and we get to talk about a mud pit...
Btw a lot of what is posted on online newspapers are rubbish
too.
have u read the NY Times? or the London Times? or BBC
Online?