I don't think you understand. Singapore never gave away Coco
Islands. The British administrators of the Colony of Singapore
did.
Well, Pedra Blangka is an important strategic territory where its
surrounding waters could control the southern gate of South China
Sea. Having control over the coast around that "rock" is the
important.
It is already in our possession since our sovereignty. And now that
Malaysia is challenging us to take it away, we'll have to justify
our basic rights that it is ours.
It is stated in state papers that if it is taken away, it violates
our independence and constitution.
The purpose of the level of importance to our nation is of our
primary interest.
Taking in territories to increase our area is not even of secondary
importance. What primary importance is Coco Islands and Christmas
Island is for us?
Simply for NTUC Club to setup a retirement centre over there? I
don't think it is worth the price that need the Singapore
government to run our economic and miltary interests there.
But so far what I've seen of "your interests" is not of primary
importance.
Remember this point, if you want something, you need to protect it.
It is just like having a pet, if you want a pet, you need to take
care of it and protect it.
For Coco Islands and Christmas Island, we couldn't even say that
those over there are Singaporeans. They are also Malay people from
Malaya who went to Coco Islands and Christma Island.
Is Malaysia going to take back the Cocos Island because their
people is there too?
Your logic may sound logical but it ain't sensible. It is
dangerous. It will screw up the territorial politics in the
world.
If one nation DID possess a territory in the past and is able to
get it back, what if Malaysia wanted to take back
Singapore?