Homosexual

last SG · 2004-05-01T04:04:02+00:00

maybe? because things would just get more expensive to solve the “problem” of all that extra money

PRP SG

Heng,

U said i had a small mind.Isn't that show your arrogance?

U called me as "siggy". Isn't that an insulting word?

PRP SG

1. Is heterosexuality right or wrong? Right.

2. Is homosexuality right or wrong? Some ppl say there is no answer to this question.Then why does the 1st question has answer and it is also about sexuality? So the opinion of these ppl is wrong.Maybe they don't know the answer to the question or they have something to hide.

CX,

I've given my reasons why homosexuality is wrong in my past msg.Pls read them again.

CX SG

Originally posted by PRP:
1. Is heterosexuality right or wrong? Right.

what's so right about it? why should a physical and biological function have a "right" or "wrong" attached to it??? its like asking if it is right to sit down and pee, or is it wrong to stand up and pee. either way, WHAT'S SO RIGHT OR WRONG ABOUT IT???

2. Is homosexuality right or wrong? Some ppl say there is no answer to this question.Then why does the 1st question has answer and it is also about sexuality? So the opinion of these ppl is wrong.Maybe they don't know the answer to the question or they have something to hide.

the first question was based on flawed premises to begin with. so your second conclusion, is similarly flawed. your first question is INVALID and your second question is complex BEYOND a simple right / wrong answer.

unfortunately, your ignorance blinds u to the possibilities and u just keep insisting on your narrow OPINION.

an opinion is like an arsehole... everyone has one... unless u can back it up with PROOF like i keep asking u to, you have NOTHING to argue with.

CX,

I've given my reasons why homosexuality is wrong in my past msg.Pls read them again.

i've also told u that your "reasons" are based on faulty pre-conceived notions, ignorance and bigotry.

u have not addressed ANY of that and u have not brought up ANY proof to support your position.

i have nothing more to say to u and u can basically take your ignorance and bigotry, and shove it up your arse where it belongs.

PRP SG

CX,

Is heterosexual right?

U argued that what was so right about it.I refrain from saying u are stupid even thou u said i'm stupid.

Many ppl can answer that question correctly but u can't Are u more intelligent than they? They: the herterosexual majority.

If u eat with your mouth,then that's right.Suppose u eat with your ear,then u are wrong.Simple to understand or not?

CX SG

Originally posted by PRP:
CX,

Is heterosexual right?

U argued that what was so right about it.I refrain from saying u are stupid even thou u said i'm stupid.

u quite obviously are... otherwise why i keep asking u for PROOF, but i keep getting OPINION???

Many ppl can answer that question correctly but u can't Are u more intelligent than they? They: the herterosexual majority.

pple will just tell u that it is a preference. there is no right and wrong to a preference. it doesn't take a genius to know that... but it would takes a stupid bigot to totally miss that.

majority = correct? so going by that logic, racism is perfectly justified? Sg got 70% chinese... so chinese are always right? u're talking cock.

If u eat with your mouth,then that's right.Suppose u eat with your ear,then u are wrong.Simple to understand or not?

u really do sound like u got pork chops stuffed in your ears... refer to my example on peeing.

[email protected] SG

ahahaha
no when stating a fact, it is hardly called arrogance. u know why i say u have a small mind?
the answer lies in your 2nd question.
no. siggy is not an insulting word. wherever did u hear that from genius? siggy is a slang for "signature" a siggy is the lines the always appear with your every post, at the bottom of your post. in your case, your siggy is "PRP, for fairness, righteousness & kindness". mine is "Bernie Ecclestone talking in July 2002 about the location of the next new grand prix country: "I can't tell you where it is. But they eat a lot of Chinese food." (the next GP turned out to be in Bahrain)" while CX's is "...Aimez ce que jamais on ne verra deux fois..." geddit?

soooo there. u can even misunderstand the meaning of the word "siggy" now u know why i think u're small minded?(actually the correct phrase is narrow minded, but lets use your terms so u can understand better)

Lingos SG

I dont' think the argument is whether homosexuality is right or wrong.
We do not have the right to judge.
It's a matter of whether you can accept it.
If you can't. Oh well.. who cares? To each his own.

Until the time someone gets violent with a homosexual it doesn't concern me.

CX SG

so what would you do IF someone DID get violent with one of an different sexual persuasion?

[email protected] SG

time to bring out the posse, guns blazin', thugs be thuggin' leave 'em lying in white chalk.

Lingos SG

Hmmm.. put it this way.

Dog lovers, cat lovers.
People who love dogs hate cats.
Whatever.. who cares?

But when people start setting kittens alight, i'd be really pissed and want them to burn too. Ya know what i mean?

[email protected] SG

yes of course. those people are the perfect targets for the sadist in me.

PRP SG

CX,
U SEEM to be very good in arguing.Like the above argument,u still can't understand the logic.

Make it simple, pls answer the question directly: Is homosexualilty right or wrong? -- a simple answer pls,ie right or wrong

[email protected] SG

life is not as simple as right or wrong. there are many grey areas. pls don't be so simplistic because it's never simple.

PRP SG

Lingos,

Why don't we have to right to judge?

As i said before,every thing we do has a dimention of right or wrong.If homosexuality is right, then anybody can choose for it if he so want.

Suppose homo is right, is having sex with animal aslo right?

oldbreadstinks SG

thats the spirit PRP!, go get that bitch! Very Happy

regarding your question on homosexuality being right or wrong?
that would depend on whether you're basing your question on society or the law since the two seems to be seperate, judging from the recent revelation that blowjobs are illegal
i don't think its a right or wrong, its more of acceptable or not

if you're judging by what society can accept, then i would have to say although i'm not in favour of it, society is begining to accept that homosexuality is here to stay and it exists, whether you think its in the genes or by choice

by saying that its wrong just because society does not accept is not a valid reason for rejecting their existence

CX SG

oh stuff it up yours... Rolling Eyes Evil or Very Mad Mad

5 pages of posts are WASTED on a pig-headed fool like u...

already told u, explained to u, gave u examples and rebutted your points one by one... STILL u ask the same stupid question.

you are the one that's being illogical and stubborn here.

sure... condemn what u do not understand, insist on your own opinion and refuse to hear any other views. turn a blind eye to all eveidence of doubts... may u live happily ever after in the abyss of ignorance.

if ignorance is bliss, u must be the happiest man alive. Rolling Eyes

[email protected] SG

Originally posted by CX:

oh stuff it up yours...

5 pages of posts are WASTED on a pig-headed fool like u...

already told u, explained to u, gave u examples and rebutted your points one by one... STILL u ask the same stupid question.

you are the one that's being illogical and stubborn here.

sure... condemn what u do not understand, insist on your own opinion and refuse to hear any other views. turn a blind eye to all eveidence of doubts...[b] may u live happily ever after in the abyss of ignorance.

if ignorance is bliss, u must be the happiest man alive. Rolling Eyes [/b]

what do u expect? he sees things in black and white only. so many things i can point out that i also don't know where i can begain justifying his narrow mindedness.
i say we just let him rave n rant about homos. someday he'll get whats coming to him.

PRP SG

CX,

1. We haven't come to the end of our debate yet.So the verdict is not out yet.

2. A good intellectual doesn't insult his opponent in debating.It is easy to say your opponent is stupid.I could say it on you too.

3. I'm not persuaded by your argument at all.In fact, i see much flaw in your arguments.

CX SG

Originally posted by PRP:
CX,

1. We haven't come to the end of our debate yet.So the verdict is not out yet.

WHAT DEBATE???!!! its all about YOUR opinion.

2. A good intellectual doesn't insult his opponent in debating.It is easy to say your opponent is stupid.I could say it on you too.

i would never do it to ANOTHER intellectual. its pretty obvious i do not see u as one.

your views ARE stupid. in this case, it is not an insult, it is an observation.

3. I'm not persuaded by your argument at all.In fact, i see much flaw in your arguments.

i told u long ago! CITE THEM!!! pick them out, and lets see why u think they're flawed.

until u adopt a more sophisticated position that takes into consideration the complexities involved, u can carry on debating with yourself.

my position is clear: the study of sexuality is complex beyond a simple "right-wrong" answer. a lot of what we feel and believe are rooted in modern misconceptions and misinformation, and bigotry and narrow mindedness as well as simple fear had spawned the worse ideas of homophobia that i particularly, see in YOU.

why can't we judge u ask? BECAUSE U'RE NOT GOD.

Stevenson101 SG

We haven't come to the end of our debate yet.So the verdict is not out yet.

debate as most completely used in this forum is to engage in argument by discussing opposing points, it is not like trying to agreeing on how much to raise the GST rates or how much clothing is considered indecent on television.

The way i look at it, it's a waste of time to consider any useful debate with you PRP, you have already issued a verdict and thus finished the debate before it even started.

Homosexuality whether it's right or wrong? By what standards do we use for reference?

Sodomy, an act which homosexuals parttake in is considered an offence that would get you stoned to death regardless of whether it was voluntary in the middle east, while in America no one really gives a damn if both sides consented to the act. By the laws of nature? I thought humans have already considered themselves to be beyond that for the past few decades.

So, repeating myself by whose standards do we adhere to decide the conclusion to this debate? Your narrow minded view of the world? Or our own individual opinion ?

« Previous Page Next Page »