nay... no apologies needed... i merely wanted to know what
exactly your position is on this issue...
to me, its a question of what ad the individual was replying to i
guess... if the ad says "general worker needed, no min.
qualifications", then u'll be prepared for whatever terms they
offered u no matter how mediocre (as your bak kua analogy points
out). i know grads selling satay and making a good living... no
problem with that...
but if they said "project engineer needed, min. grad with relevant
exerience", then of course u apply with some expectations... esp if
they shortlist u for interview...
its not pleasant to be offered a job to pull cable if thats not the
job u applied for lor... quite insulting too... some people would
rather be rejected not because they find the job
demeaning, but because they feel cheated!
its like job ads who're seeking "sales executives with attractive
renumeration" and u find that they're basically seeking salesmen
with no basic pay but "attractive commissions" ... thats
humbug.
the only way i see to break out of this "unfavourable
demand-supply" paradigm, is to go into business for yourself and
thats not an option for many people cos they lack the capital, the
network, or the will to carry it through.
its not cos they don't want to or don't have the idea to, but the
costs are too high... many grads have loans to pay off, parents to
support and expectations to live up to... its not easy for them to
defy the norms and walk off the beaten path...
thats probably why entrepreneurs are "oddballs" and non-grads, cos
they have nothing to lose by trying new things. its sad that our
society, despite all its rhetorics, is not yet mature enough to
accept different models of success.