Redeployments (Part 23)

last SG · 2016-08-31T15:59:21+00:00

So plus 5 S1 equal 17 buses?A22 added? Around there ah. Similar to 911 case

carbikebus SG

And funny thing why Kjdep need SMB183 when they don't have any Citaros now?

SBS3004X SG

đ Hey gina,Sembawang used to be under Woodlands purview in case you didn't know.859 is still under Wldep also.

Excuse me, I know that it was once under WLDEP. That is why I said 'for a few months already'.

hgdep103 SG

SBS3110Y

HGDEP 103 > HGDEP SP

no more DDs

carbikebus SG

Excuse me, I know that it was once under WLDEP. That is why I said 'for a few months already'.

Your statement always misleading leh..Why Sembawang cannot be under Woodlands when the off service distance is much nearer than Amdep?With all service under BCM do you still think Budep can control Bt Merah side for 167?

AntiDennisLance SG

SBS3110Y

HGDEP 103 > HGDEP SP

no more DDs

3110Y still seen on 103 as recently as this Wed or Thur morning.

hgdep103 SG

3110Y still seen on 103 as recently as this Wed or Thur morning.

Wef 31 Oct

carbikebus SG

969 should have 18 DDs, 7 bendies and no SDs!

Anyway, is 969 run time that long, as for 27-30 Buses to be deployed?

As for 857, its berth in Yishun is not long enough.

969 people claimed that the fleet consist of 29 duties which i doubt so,Runtime already 1hr 05 mins and buses are crawling at 35-40kmh on expressways..Maybe 27 duties is more appropriate.Got 1 S67 split shift that will do S969 during PM split..

SMB1333T SG

And funny thing why Kjdep need SMB183 when they don't have any Citaros now?

Route familiarisation.

Same thing as why smrt needs o405 volgren trg when they have no more o405 on revenue svc

carbikebus SG

Route familiarisation.

Same thing as why smrt needs o405 volgren trg when they have no more o405 on revenue svc

O405 bo bian leh,Used to be their trademark model too as all depot can maintain them.

lemon1974 SG

Seem from this week, 853 getting back OCs n 855 getting back citaros

carbikebus SG

Which DDs doing Express 868 currently?

SBS3004X SG

OK, I have a better example.

Why is 857 under partial WLDEP control when its only terminal is under AMDEP control?

SMB1368T SG

So you are saying that 856 is not under WLDEP either?

TIB 585L SG

OK, I have a better example.

Why is 857 under partial WLDEP control when its only terminal is under AMDEP control?

What is ur problem? Why question depot control. Just let it be lah. Ure not LTA to question them

carbikebus SG

OK, I have a better example.

Why is 857 under partial WLDEP control when its only terminal is under AMDEP control?

How big is AMDEP compared to WLDEP?

carbikebus SG

SG5746L still reflected in 983?Sgwiki..

SBS8676Z SG

SMRT should have moved 857 to full AMDEP and let WLDEP take back half of 969 duties. More practical this way.

SBS8676Z SG

OK, I have a better example.

Why is 857 under partial WLDEP control when its only terminal is under AMDEP control?

For info, 857 started off as full WLDEP controlled when it was introduced back in Jan 2001. While 965 started off as dual AM/WL when introduced in 2002.

It was somewhere in Nov 2010 when 965 moved to full WLDEP in exchange for 857 under dual AMDEP.

TIB 585L SG

For info, 857 started off as full WLDEP controlled when it was introduced back in Jan 2011. While 965 started off as dual AM/WL when introduced in 2002.

It was somewhere in Nov 2000 when 965 moved to full WLDEP in exchange for 857 under dual AMDEP.

Ur facts is really contradicting. I suggest u read back what u read. U said it started off AM/WL in 2002 but it moved back to full WL in 2000? Since when 857 started off in 2011, it started off in 2001 btw and for 10 years it was full WLDEP until they swap with 965 5 yrs ago

SMB3163D SG

« Previous Page Next Page »