ok i rmb posting here quite sometime about growin taller . im
back again, but ive grown onli lik 2 cm. so im standin 162cm right
now, im 16 in sec 4 now.
the average is around 165+? there r exceptional cases lah, but i
find myself the 3rd shortest in class already.
i read some posts from gals about some 'pefect bf"...and they wan
their bf to be at least 175cm..-.-|| even though i haf no interest
in the owners of e blogs i read, i feel kinda stunned. i min
lik....agonized n angry also.
i keep thinkin, if they can say things like they're just fine with
average looks but height must be above some criteria..., then we
guys can say things like, average looks ok but bo*bs must be of
certain size, if not will reject
it's almost the same thing we're comparin. i min as in. a guy's
height is part of his physical appearance, and it's is a "want" for
a gal. while it's the same way round inversely.., i hope i made
sense. cox both u carn control it's growth and it's just part of
puberty...
so now is not the problem wif no confidence or whatever crap. it's
just that how come gals can be so insensitive. at least some say
things lik "taller then me den ok already "..., it's more
comforting cox i tink 162 can be onpar or taller den mani gals. so
i feel more relived...
how wud pple react if we wud only wan a gf with a considerable size
of b**bs...., it wud seem lik the guy is pervertic and askin for
too much cox these kind of stuff is not controllable. it's the same
thing, just overlooked..
how wud a gal feel if she likes a guy but the guy rejects her by
sayin " sorry ur those r too small? "..
guys with good looks or bad looks, as long as they r tall. it
doesn't matter. but short or below avg guys even wif avg looks may
haf problemss...
haix. just kinda ranting...
