http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/forum-letters/story/articulated-buses-more-suitable-some-passengers-smrt-20140207
"That being said, we have procured a new batch of
double-decker buses,
which will be plying the roads alongside the articulated
buses in the later part of this year.
Both types of
buses are needed to fulfil different passenger
needs."
There. You said that there is no way. I take it as you think
SMRT will buy 0 bendies for good. Which isn't true!And when did I
even say the new bendies will come before the old ones go?? I only
said they have interest to purchase new bendies. You? You said
there is NO WAY SMRT will buy new bendies, which isn't true of
course!Well I'm sorry for using that language if you don't like it,
but don't completely think it's all safe and friendly on the net as
I'll tell u it's not. And it will take a long time to make it a
beautiful place with rainbows and butterflies.
1. Stop putting words into my mouth. I was replying to the
comment in the context of "If happen by this year...". I said SMRT
Buses will not buy new bendy buses in the immediate future because
there is sufficient in the existing fleet to go around and there
will be insufficient space to accomodate a purchase of new bendy
buses on such short notice. I did not say SMRT Buses will not buy
any new bendies ever.
2. Stop putting words into SMRT's mouth. There is equal chance
of reading the statement and interpretate as SMRT using existing
bendy buses to perform the dual operation. It could have gone
either way. There is NO explicit statement of SMRT Buses
expressing interest or intending to buy new bendy buses.
3. http://ride.asiaone.com/news/general/story/blogger-apologises-sending-e-mail-rant-sbs
4. If you have read my posting history, I actually support the
use of bendy buses under the correct conditions (feeder routes
being one of them). I do not understand why you have to jump at
today's reply.