you cant make use of my word against me, because my points have
been accurate and concise, this is the reason why
(i did it for many times already... :/)
as for using my words, its because you could no longer defend your
points and go monkeying around by duplicating other people's words,
i am not sure why you would do that, i dont understand the business
of monkeying anyway
(i say my own point you refute it , again then u refute again, so
i'll try anther method, see how it goes. monkeying? isnt monkey an
intelligence animal which is proven by science? The method of
monekying is used in our daily life though, see and learn. )
the debate is quite useful because its reiterates and strengthen my
points from the beginning
(strengthen to wat extend? Properly whenever someone ask question
strengthen your point. i c...)
the points are so damning no one can answer for SE, answer the
points or rise up to the challenges
(i don think i mentioned anything about " if you do not know, then
do not...." or giving any evidence to prove anything, more of
coming after you. hah.)
and so far its been proven through, since no agent nor its defender
could do so, seems the only excuse is 'ask mr ignious yong' 'ask mr
jp' 'ask management'
(no agent nor defender could do so? u have seen each and everyone
of them?)
its raise the issue of investors awareness of the products or
schemes they invest in or something outsiders cannot defend
(outsider defend for wat? maybe the topics interest him or her, so
join in for discussion. This thread never say only the defender and
the attacker can speak.)
ok not defending for anyone..so i guess you are not defending SE
against people's negative opinions, you are not defending SE agent
against fear of lawsuits rather than highlighting the agents
ignorance..so on and so forth
(for once u are correct there, am consciously telling u that i am
not defending for them.,just that u think that way, or u thought
that guessing and asking question is part of defending?)
better try next time, but it doesnt convince me
(you too,try harder next time, it doesnt convince me either.)
i never said you would be 100% one of them, which is why for the
second time i request you do read my previous post before that..i
guess its your uncle mindset...
(well, for the first few post you assumed it is, then after a few
post later, you give a second thought. if i rememberd correctly, i
did say something like "surprisingly that etc etc etc")
again, my points have been concise and accurate, so there isnt any
issue if someone is asked to read properly before shaming
himself
(Concise and accurate? don think so ba,from what i seen is you
twist and diverge alot of ur point as well, and of course, u can
deny =]. I prefer wat Mrleech opinion =].)
*shrugs*
(haiz...)
