ahh, let me phrase it more simpler for you to understand.. btw,
chelsea is still not the most profitable club in the world.. even
bayern munich earns more every year
and RM has a big kitty every season which can reach as high as 50m
and turnover often are far greater than that.. BTW, Please don't
burst a blood vessel because I can sense you're smacking on your
keyboard while replying 
joker, if you wanna talk about players who reach prime at 23, every
club will compete.. we're talking about 18 year old prodigies or
even younger The names you mention aren't prodigies and are
not that impressive, If a player is good if he has capped for his
country.. Then michael ricketts must be worth 10m 
michael duberry must be worth 20m
so many years like 4 years, newcastle always snapped up players
right in front of liverpool's face.. whose the bigger and better
club now? when robson was in charge, everyone went to
newcastle rather than liverpool.. times has changed, SAF is losing
it and everyone knows because he trusts his oldies too much while
wenger, jol promises 1st team action for youngsters
times changed, SAF is not as attractive as he was before.. they
would rather go to wenger, mourinho, jol, benitez to be nurtured
ball is round, and again times has changed
there is a team that can outbid chelsea, from la liga if you're
clueless again, RM is based as a coporation although not as
rich as RA, They don't dig into their personal fortunes and they
believe in economic buys
and i'm pointing out some points and facts but apparently kids
nowadays get very upset from online forum posts
bellamy took a wage cut, and i not sure whether arsenal got offer
anot but manu and liverpool did offer while newcastle didn't get a
chance because he signed in a record time bellamy took a
wage cut from blackburn. And the carry-on was directed at smith's
decision to move to manure
And seriously, stop denying that manu is a crumbling dynasty..
End.[/b][/quote]
