Get this, I also have my demand, you've your demand, so now, how
to balance everyone's need? Defintely bus - bus system is one
way.
Elderly is another issue, but take a look at the usual
Singaporeans behaviour. I surveyed Pioneer station for quite some
time, even some thoughts turns out to be true.
It's not demeaning, for there's lots of unacceptable behaviour
i.e. not moving to upper deck. Now you deprive others of a boarding
chance, complain what? The world dun go around yourself, it evolves
with everyone.
If I can walk under the hot sun, I've never complained knowing
there's no way every single bus sv can suit me.
As for feeders, wasn't there 241? Furthermore, it's becoming
clear as the new town develops further and how lopsided it is
located for the BIs say Sengkang, feeder/ trunk concept would
slowly kick in. Then what about the last MRT train?
Things dun stick with no new feeders or whatever forever, it's
how it evolves for the better of everyone's overall travelling
needs.
The amendment of Service 105 doesn't affect me as much as you
like it to be. The effect is there, but negligible.
Does it bite you that I want to fight for the convenience of
Serangoon residents?
Your survey of Pioneer station doesn't mean anything. It's just
a small sample and not representative of the situation of
Singapore. Besides who gave you the authority to make claims that
cannot substantiated?
If you want to walk under the sun and rain or snow for what
matter, that's you. Why must you force everybody to be like you?
Talk about the world revolving around me, you are the one who
thinks the world revolves around you.
And you conveniently push the issue of the needs of the elderly
aside? How clever!
The issue 105 is not asking for new connections but to preserve
existing connections.
Students would be affected, they have to spend more time
travelling.
supremebull> People around Serangoon Ave 2 can still walk to
take 73, as for those in Boundary Road, the amendment would be
inconvenient for them.
