Places not suitable for double decks to ply

last SG · 2011-07-23T23:36:30+00:00

It was mentioned in the earlier page.But I think that only T3 is not suitable for double deckers... T2 has height limit of 3.8m, T3 has height limit of 4.2m...

sbst275 SG

Seeing the comments isn't going anywhere. Everyone missed the point that infrastructure must be proper before bigger double decks can appear.

I'll list some hazard locations.

1) PIE > Jln Anak Bukit slip road: 1x tree too low, too near.

2) Hillview Ave: Center divider trees, on top of KTM bridge

3) Dunearn Rd: Classical one, impeding 66 & 67 to use DDs.

4) Woodlands Rd: Trees again, near Sg Kadut

5) Henderson Rd (Telok Blangah)

6) Depot Rd (Trees)

alize SG

Stevens Road

SBS8675B SG

Stevens Road

Then explain why service 132 has DDs?

SBS8675B SG

Bus lane under CTE Braddell Flyover towards Lorong Chuan. Services 73, 105 and 159 are unable to use DDs due to the height limit beneath the flyover.

Arlene19890120 SG

spam...

kengkia SG

Bus lane under CTE Braddell Flyover towards Lorong Chuan. Services 73, 105 and 159 are unable to use DDs due to the height limit beneath the flyover.

erm....just make the fly over higher can already lor. if dun use DD how can sbs profit more right?

kengkia SG

Seeing the comments isn't going anywhere. Everyone missed the point that infrastructure must be proper before bigger double decks can appear.

I'll list some hazard locations.

1) PIE > Jln Anak Bukit slip road: 1x tree too low, too near.

2) Hillview Ave: Center divider trees, on top of KTM bridge

3) Dunearn Rd: Classical one, impeding 66 & 67 to use DDs.

4) Woodlands Rd: Trees again, near Sg Kadut

5) Henderson Rd (Telok Blangah)

6) Depot Rd (Trees)

are the NEA so stingy that they refused to spend money on trimming trees?

alize SG

Then explain why service 132 has DDs?

Orh.

sbst275 SG

7) Upp Bt Timah Rd, towards Woodlands near Rail Mall. Low branches

8) Upp Aljunied Rd

9) Lor Chuan

10) Airport PTB

11) Kallang Way

sbst275 SG

are the NEA so stingy that they refused to spend money on trimming trees?

Many of these are old trees making it big trunk feature.

It's either remove or no ADD.

Edd1 SG

Joo Chiat area.

kengkia SG

lengkok bahur-rumah tinggi area

QX179R SG

simei rd turning to simei street 1..

simei street 4 but I ever saw an off svc svc 9 DD passing thru..

Junyang700 SG

7) Upp Bt Timah Rd, towards Woodlands near Rail Mall. Low branches

8) Upp Aljunied Rd

9) Lor Chuan

10) Airport PTB

11) Kallang Way

For 7)

Former Service 5 (Between Bukit Panjang and Geylang Lorong 1) used to have double deckers.

sbst275 SG

For 7)

Former Service 5 (Between Bukit Panjang and Geylang Lorong 1) used to have double deckers.

Pretty recent one la

SGCar SG

Heard Sixth Ave was one of the affected roads, is it true?

Cheers.

SBS 1000U SG

Tree can be pruned or replaced by taller and shadier trees. This is flexible.

So I can only think of 2 areas, flyover over Lorong Chuan, and Changi Airport due to poor planning...

Scania SG

are the NEA so stingy that they refused to spend money on trimming trees?

NEA don't deal with trees.

And besides that, trees along certain roads like Henderson are conserved trees, so you can't cut them or their branches away unless they pose an immediate danger to the public.

kengkia SG

my bad, then trees should come under SLA ba.

carbikebus SG

Hmm quite a handful belong to SMRT territories,One reason why they use bendies