Places not suitable for double decks to ply

sbst275 SG

my bad, then trees should come under SLA ba.

NParks

That said, conservation of trees can't be in the pace of usage of double decker buses. It's not nice to put it, but older trees seems to be getting harder and harder to be maintained i.e. termites

SMB128B SG

merdeka bridge?

tranquilice SG

Joo Chiat Place, Rd
Siglap Rd (New Upp Changi Rd - East Coast Rd)
Mount Sinai area
Fidelio St, Taman Kembangan area
Mount Faber Rd
South Buona Vista Rd (Science Park Dr - Pasir Panjang Rd)
Hillview Rd

lemon1974 SG

8) Upp Aljunied Rd

DDs did ply this road when Macpherson road was closed some time back due to some accident? And Sv135 did use NAC DDs also

lemon1974 SG

Ang Mo Kio Ave 1.. the part between Ave 3/Ave 6 where only Sv262/761 ply?

sbst275 SG

DDs did ply this road when Macpherson road was closed some time back due to some accident? And Sv135 did use NAC DDs also

In a sense more of conserved trees issue.

I believe TIs were deployed on site before go ahead was given.

SBS8675B SG

Heard Sixth Ave was one of the affected roads, is it true?

Cheers.

Seems true.

But last time the old service 5 (Bt Panjang to Geylang Lor 1) when under SBS in the 90s had Merc 0305s and LAs running...

SBS8675B SG

Last time I remember services like 26, 35, 90, 130, 135, 139, 142, 269, 410 ever had NAC DDs (be it 0305s, LAs or LO2x) running before. Service 410 also had a VSO appearance once in 2005. Somehow are there any reasons why ADDs are not deployed to these a/m services?

jayh272416 SG

the inside of my house.

sbs7207b SG

Tree is not an issue. They can be trimmed if SBS Transit ask someone to do it.

Why no one mentioning about Changi Airport Terminal?

Gus.chong SG

7) Upp Bt Timah Rd, towards Woodlands near Rail Mall. Low branches

8) Upp Aljunied Rd

9) Lor Chuan

10) Airport PTB

11) Kallang Way

For 9), the Lorong Chuan between Serangoon Garden Way and Ang Mo Kio Ave 1 is DD accessible, since 136 has Wrights before plying there.

SGCar SG

I remember 139 was due to the narrow road along Kim Keat Rd IIRC, it did have LO3X running that time, but think some right angle turning point not suitable for ADD.

26, 35, 90, 130, 135, 142 & 269 never got the chance to get ADD when NAC DDs phase out, dunno the reason why, but most probably not cost effective.

410 use LO2X before, not sure ADD did appear before.

Cheers.

vicamour SG

I remember 139 was due to the narrow road along Kim Keat Rd IIRC, it did have LO3X running that time, but think some right angle turning point not suitable for ADD.

26, 35, 90, 130, 135, 142 & 269 never got the chance to get ADD when NAC DDs phase out, dunno the reason why, but most probably not cost effective.

410 use LO2X before, not sure ADD did appear before.

Cheers.

Volvo Olympian batch 2 did a short slint on 26 before.

lemon1974 SG

410 use LO2X before, not sure ADD did appear before.

Cheers.

410 did use ADDs (VSO) due to some special occasion at Bright Hill Temple before.. think only one day?

SBS 1000U SG

Tree is not an issue. They can be trimmed if SBS Transit ask someone to do it.

Why no one mentioning about Changi Airport Terminal?

It was mentioned in the earlier page.

But I think that only T3 is not suitable for double deckers...

Scania SG

It was mentioned in the earlier page.

But I think that only T3 is not suitable for double deckers...

T2 has height limit of 3.8m, T3 has height limit of 4.2m, and all terminals don't allow vehicles with 3 axles or more into the basement (or so they say).

« Previous Page