Wiki Misuse

last SG · 2009-05-20T23:15:36+00:00

? i thot it swap with SBS9341H? or is they swap back?

.SBS9888Y. SG

I would like to thank all who have kept Buses @ SgWiki well updated but would also like to urge all SgWiki users who edit the database not to misuse the privileges afforded to you, otherwise Buses @ SgWiki would likely be locked from editing to SysOps users only if more of such incidents occur.

User: Bustour1234567890 has been barred from SgWiki for misusing it by making countless unearthly edits.

These pictures show only one of the edits.

Edits like these will not be tolerated. We have since reverted all of such edits promptly.

Regards
SysOps Committee.

TIB537B SG

I would like to urge all SgWiki users who edit the database not to misuse the privileges afforded to you or else Buses @ SgWiki will be locked from editing to SysOps users only.

User: Bustour1234567890 has been barred from SgWiki for misusing it by making countless unearthly edits.

These pictures show only one of the edits.

Edits like these will not be tolerated. We have since reverted all of such edits promptly.

Regards
SysOps Committee.

I'm currently learning deployments and regos via sgwiki. I'm disappointed to learn that there are vandals who have no life to edit the sgwiki without any consideration for other sgwiki users. The vandals should be dealt with harshly.

SMRT BUSES LuvER SG

User: Bustour1234567890 has been barred from SgWiki for misusing it by making countless unearthly edits.

These pictures show only one of the edits.

the user who did this shld post this deployment to the 'Your Own Deployment Fleet' thread instead of sgwiki.. -.-

deli_1971 SG

confirm is some childish act from some kid

SBS8533C SG

Good news that he has been hit by the banhammer!!

Bus&Soccer l0v3r (VO3x 1) SG

He must have predict the future perm of svc170

sgbuses SG

English Wikipedia also receiving quite a bit of these as well.

SBS2601D SG

"Wiki misuse" is a pretty open-ended title.

I suggest the following titles:

Wiki Misused: The Myth and the Facts.

Or:

Miki Misusing: The Idiot's Guide to Misusing Wiki.

SBS8033D SG

I do wonder who actually hacked my account to edit all those.........And the worst thing, I was not even onto the computer at 1.04pm, just came out of school, impossible seh.....

I am not blaming anyone here, and if there's any inconvience, sorry.

SBS n SMRT SG

this idoit really have no brainer, in sg all JB reg bus are mk 3, yet he post all mk 4 think pple will belief him like tat, damm sad for him, in addition, i seriously recommand giving sysops to all bus forum users whom passed a certain cretria or so on......and lock the pages for deployment to all non-reliable forum users............

..............but i think that deployment may occur (OT).......as mk 4 had been x-fer to bbdep and perharps used for 160

SBS n SMRT SG

I do wonder who actually hacked my account to edit all those.........And the worst thing, I was not even onto the computer at 1.04pm, just came out of school, impossible seh.....

I am not blaming anyone here, and if there's any inconvience, sorry.

morale of the story: Use a strong password such as this

FGds%$e#76ttG

SBS n SMRT SG

Important message to sysops

do not ban IP address, remove user can, it is because if you ban IP address of user, the IP address banned is not the user own IP, it is the ISP IP address that may hinder all users under the ISP to be unable to edit the page, i am one of them, my IP kinna block by block ID 33 also, so please just block user only. in fact, in wikipedia, if the user is using a dynamic or proxy IP ,the sysops there will issue a strong warning to the user or use a soft-block (Just ban for 2 days) as it will directly affect users worldwide.

thanks

ngjy22 SG

He must have predict the future perm of svc170

Not really predict, I can just say he got too much time day dreaming, which results on " overdreaming"

JaSoNhSu92 SG

i would say that guy treat the sgwiki as their "future-predicting" wiki without looking the present.

SBS8533C SG

Important message to sysops

thanks

But I believe by banning the User ID itself, he may create a new account to edit his crap again. So by banning his IP address, the banned user will not be able to create new accounts to edit sgwiki pages.

Fryderyk HPH SG

Important message to sysops

thanks

Correct. This is what I told TS already.

.SBS9888Y. SG

his ip has been blocked meaning he cant create new accounts.

.SBS9888Y. SG

Important message to sysops

thanks

list your edits here and i will update it for you.

TIB1234T SG

He must have predict the future perm of svc170

Maybe he's right, then omg..........

sgbuses SG

Enable account creation blocked. Problem solved.

If you IP range-block an entire ISP (this option is distinct from blocking a single account, but uses the same interface to do so), unchecking "Anonymous Users Only", you are taking out 1/3 of all Singapore population including registered users. If you check "Prevent Account Creation" under this option, no new accounts can be created by any user under that ISP.

Also take note of autoblock that may also be in effect on ALL IPs that is used by the blocked account for a minimum of 24 hours and subsequently, any IP that the blocked account attempts to use.