http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/singaporeseen/viewContent.jsp?id=56462
The above article's link has been posted in the thread "Bus
Articles in the Newspapers and Stomp.sg " and it has got me
thinking of the nonsense posted here. Take note that I am not
directly shooting at anyone specifically but this is a general
reminder.
A word of caution to those posting crap here: I have posted this
in the other thread already, but please NEVER suggest to ammend
routes with a long history or high elderly demand. It is never
easy for these elderly folks to get used to route
ammendments if they have problems getting used to seeing "G" or "W"
on the EDS display. I can even remember someone posting major
ammendment to Service 25 in that thread. If you would like to know
why the PTC/LTA allows Services 25 and 854 to duplicate each
other from Bedok all the way to Hougang Ave 2 until TODAY, the
above mentioned might be a possible reason.
On the other hand, please only suggest routes that have a
practical reason and not just because "It provides direct
link from XXX to XXX". Think of the consequences if ALL
the crap routes posted here are implemented. You might see
buses running empty. It makes me feel as if you people are
spamming the thread making it hard for few of other's
genuine suggestions to be seen.
note that it's just plain suggestions only.
as long as it's a route suggestion; be it good or bad;
are all welcomed.
whether LTA wants to accept those routes are another
matter altogether.
i fully agree with n4l here.