Jesus was a Hindu Monk and Survived the Cross

last SG · 2011-12-07T15:08:38+00:00

Tcmc,1. And I shall again emphasize this. You demand for empirical proofs that miracles happened 2000 years ago. You claimed, at the very least, that miracle...

Turbulent Times SG

Documentary from BBC that unravels the myths and theories of Jesus life and death:

1. Jesus survived the cross

2. Jesus was a Hindu monk

3. Jesus burial site discovered

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YbUEZfJJaQ

What do you think? WHat do you believe?

Rooney_07 SG

yes I know about this. I even have a book on this, written by a german in the 90s.

BanguIzai SG

cool story bro

Tcmc SG

It is a possibility that jesus was influenced by buddhism or hinduism during his "missing years".

The bible records nothing about jesus from a child to a young adult.

So some people do speculate that he had been to India because of the similarities between buddhism (which predates xtianity) and christianity

BroInChrist SG

It is a possibility that jesus was influenced by buddhism or hinduism during his "missing years".

The bible records nothing about jesus from a child to a young adult.

So some people do speculate that he had been to India because of the similarities between buddhism (which predates xtianity) and christianity

Tcmc,

What similarities you talking about? Please explain.

Tcmc SG

Tcmc,

What similarities you talking about? Please explain.

This is a well debated issue among christians and buddhists for some time already. You mean you didnt know?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_Christianity

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallels_between_Gautama_Buddha_and_Jesus

Wikipedia not the best source, but still ok.

BroInChrist SG

This is a well debated issue among christians and buddhists for some time already. You mean you didnt know?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_Christianity

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallels_between_Gautama_Buddha_and_Jesus

Wikipedia not the best source, but still ok.

Tcmc,

Well debated? I don't think so. This is hardly a popular notion and few serious-minded scholars even take this seriously. This is mainly speculation trying to pass itself off as something serious. I have long known about this and I think it is flakey and shoddy.

Rooney_07 SG

Tcmc,

well I am not even sure if this is real. similarly Jesus resurrection was real? any proof that he was resurrected? oh in the bible he was resurrected I see

BroInChrist SG

well I am not even sure if this is real. similarly Jesus resurrection was real? any proof that he was resurrected? oh in the bible he was resurrected I see

Rooney, How do you suppose one should go about ascertaining whether a reported event really happened a long time ago?

Rooney_07 SG

Rooney, How do you suppose one should go about ascertaining whether a reported event really happened a long time ago?

you can't because no known man in history has ever come back from the dead. Maybe Jesus was the first one to come back in the bible.

Rooney_07 SG

so when is Jesus second coming? did the bible provide year and month? any person with the name of Jesus Christ is not counted.

Dalforce 1941 SG

Interesting thesis on Jesus.

Rooney_07 SG

at least it provide another perspective of his missing years, interesting read.

its just like xtian would insists this is rubbish, just like we reckoned god does not exists, same here.

Tcmc SG

well I am not even sure if this is real. similarly Jesus resurrection was real? any proof that he was resurrected? oh in the bible he was resurrected I see

I have asked BIC to provide evidence or proof, but he plainly told me he cant.

Just accept what he says as "claims" without proof then.

BroInChrist SG

you can't because no known man in history has ever come back from the dead. Maybe Jesus was the first one to come back in the bible.

Rooney,

On what basis do you say that no known man in history has ever come back from the dead? Tell me, do you hold to naturalism as a worldview?

BroInChrist SG

I have asked BIC to provide evidence or proof, but he plainly told me he cant.

Just accept what he says as "claims" without proof then.

But you haven't provided the tools for how one can empirically prove that a miracle happened 2000 years ago! I already said it, you give me the tools and I will give you the proof. No tools no proofs.

Rooney_07 SG

I have asked BIC to provide evidence or proof, but he plainly told me he cant.

Just accept what he says as "claims" without proof then.

the proof is the bible ma

Tcmc SG

There are many ways to prove something.

One method is to reproduce the effect.

Thats why I told you to do what daniel did in the bible.

But you already told me you cant reproduce it, so i dunno why you are bringing it up again

Rooney_07 SG

why should he provide tools so that you can provide proof. the onus is on you to provide proof since you claim he came back from the dead isnt it. if you cant provide, just say so and move on.

BroInChrist SG

There are many ways to prove something.

One method is to reproduce the effect.

Thats why I told you to do what daniel did in the bible.

But you already told me you cant reproduce it, so i dunno why you are bringing it up again

OK, so tell me, how does one go about proving an effect of a miracle that happened 2000 years ago. You tell me how to do it and I will attempt to get the proof for you. Game on?