Do you guys actually understand what you posted ? Or is this
just a cut n post without even knowing what it really means.
Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Religion, or at least a belief in some kind of creator, is not
incompatible with science, nor should it be. Faith, by it's very
definition, is not a function of logic, but something very human.
Where one runs into problems is when faith attempts to subvert
empirical fact with doctrine. Or, conversely, when science attempts
to destroy faith by the misapplication of fact.
Big bang of a big bang ? Are u proposing infinity + 1 ? Sure. If
that makes you guys feel comfortable with.
Eventhough I am no cosmologist or some astrophysicist, I dont
jump the gun as if that is the truth. lol. If you guys can be
so sure on such conjecture, I really got nothing to say. It just
suprises me that you guys can give in to that much possibility on
something that is in it's infancy while discounting the
possibilities of the opposite. So I think you guys are just sucking
in and spewing out whatever that fits you agendas, without even
going through something we call.. a brain.
Lets not be gullible and ignorant. Just as interesting as dumb
people's confidence is the honestly tentative and uncertain
language used by really smart people.
Dont forget that when your job is developing models, you become
well aware of how imperfect they are (despite being useful and
safe).
A question then, if the Universe is timeless, why don't we see
evidence of other civilizations that have figured it out, beat the
odds and succeeded in vastly expanding their sphere (or 3-spheres)
of influence. There must be millions of them, no ?
The double slit experiment, shows
that light behaves as both a wave and a particle, observing it
makes it one or the other.
A particle here can affect
one on the other side of the universe,
instantaneously
(why Buddha said nothing exists
independently but only in relation to one another)
Can you name me one thing on earth
which exists without dependent on another ?