its one thing for christians to tell you you are going to hell,
its another about its doctrine. Anyway if you cant see the fallacy
or paradoxes, then good luck to you, because you really needed it.
I am just here to explain the paradoxes of a god religion.
This is the funny part.
There are no paradoxes here. You have again shown none. These
paradoxes again are created by yourself again. While you can
equally believe in ... like I said, no begining and no end,
why is it absurd to believe that something that has no beginning
and no time to begin with ?
While I may not be no physicist, the basic understanding of
E=mc^2 means that matter and energy are interchangeable. What IF,
the possibilities are here, that God is not matter or energy,he is
the platonic realm, i.e. the world of logic and information; the
physical world is emergent from the platonic
realm. When I meant God is energy, it is not energy in how we
understand it. Why then is it not possible that God has been here ,
around us, and or/ in another plane ?
Matter and energy are part of od but not God himself. The equation
E=mc^2 is part of God, and since that is part of the platonic realm
it is closer to what God is. That is the wonders of mathematics.
Where there is order and mathematics, it denotes some form of
intelligence.
Dont understand ? How about the 3 laws of Thermodynamics ? If
you understand how it works, you should understand that the laws
cannot contradict each other.
We know matter CAN be destroyed. It's something we call nuclear
fusion. U say energy ? Then what about blackholes ? Are u going to
give me answers like the singularity and darkmatter energy
conversion ? If that is so, how absurb that we are still
trying to understand the universe and that our limited
understanding is that perhaps we came to existence by matter that
is already in existence ? Are u saying that science has
mastered the understanding of the universe ?
We believe the universe is the answer, but damned if we know the
question right ?
What if there is an eternal source ? Are u going to get on your
knees unzip my pants and open your mouth when when science suddenly
discovers something to explain another that has reasons to believe
what we know is wrong and there is another way to explain it ?
Because since u are that certain, I am sure you can put that wager
on.
All I am saying is, while u are supposedly "awakening" us,
perhaps I am also "awakening" you.
I dont understand how you can use both using science and false
claims to empiricism and objective unbias, to make any claims they
can... rhetoric... to form convincing yet unprovable arguments
against God.