do i have to refer to the bible to argue with you that god
exist?
sigh..... if you want to argue over this
i care not,
as this is very very subjective,
nor did i state that i am right, i merely said that in faith, we
place our trust in god, and please read john 3:16, let me ask you a
question, do you believe that jesus christ is the son of god, if
you want to disprove that jesus christ is not son of god, then i
have nothing more to say you
I do not believe in the bible
The whole question really stems from the fact
why do u believe in the bible and tat is word of god. Because god
is just an idea introduced by the bible. U believe in bible because
it says so ?
and between, i have never state that you are wrong, merely i
just listed an example, i never judge you nor question you
my statement isn't subjective,
again, how do you know there is air, the correct answer is you feel
or sense
how can this be any subjective? again i want to say this, you chose
the wrong words at the wrong time
If u ask me, I know there is air because u can conduct
experiments tat is repeatable to prove there is air tat is
logically sound and prove no other conclusion. U answer it for god,
but I ask u why different people believe in different things then u
did not answer. Is tat a clear case tat your "sensing" is
subjective and varies differently from people to people ?
this thread is not about denying god,
and one more thing, you only trying to find fault in my sentence,
but never state any form of arguement of your own,
I thought my stand is clear tat i believe there is no god. I
feel tat the TS, despite all the reasons for not believeing in god,
still believe in it nevertheless puzzling. Tat is why i ask him how
he come to the conclusion god exist in the first place
until you provide any form of evidence that god doesn't exist at
all
or i rest my case and not post again
you are just being arguemental
The burden on proving god lies on u. Tis is because u make an
extraordinary claim tat cannot be observed and logically deduced. I
can say tat there exists the invisible flying spaghetti monster.
Wat do u think is the right way ? Should u prove it wrong for me
otherwise it is deemed as fact and u have to accept it ? Or should
I show evidence tat there is the flying spaghetti monster before u
take it seriously ?