I have already explained my points too
1st part
non-suffering is the opp of suffering.
So under the circumstance that there r only suffering and
nonsuffering...
we know that if there is no suffering, there wldnt be
non-suffering
1st part
non suffering is the absence of suffering. The words themselves
already suggest tis idea. NON mean no, do not
possess the attribute etc . Non-suffering means no suffering, do
not possess the attribute of suffering. Based on wat reasoning and
evidence can u say tat suffering and non-suffering r opposite ends
?
2nd part
Ok,...from your upper posts i can see that you dont understand this
principal.
If there no sad or anger wld there be happiness??
Happiness wld be merely a normalty.
U need to convince me tat non-suffering r extreme end. Things
can go like negative or positive, or like heat, absence of a
substance. If u wanna claim tat suffering is like negative and
positive, u have to show it, othewise it simply look like heat, and
non-suffering is the absence of suffering.
