lets face it, there is this thing call Genetic inheritance, and
also whatever the father do, will more of less affect his
children.
we chinese have this saying, Fu Zai Zhi Huan (literal translation:
Debt of the father, is to be repay by his children).
From a modern point of view, tis is an outdated and unfair
practise tat has probably been aborted since the last few
centuries. As said if your father is a someone like hitler, u will
probably go and kill all his innocent decendents to pay back his
father debt. As said if a person is not involved, he shouldn''t be
punish just because they r relatives. 
If u agree then u must agree tat all the
decendent of hitler and other cruel emperors of the past have to
die even though they have nothing to do with ancestors'
actions
In chinese there is also "zhu jiu zu", which means killing all your
relatives for an offense u made, so u agree with it too ? Chinese
also have "ren zi" where they cut off the arms, leg, eyes, tongue,
ears of a person and throw them into the toilet to die. So since
tis is a chinese saying it must make sense to do it to others
?
comparing both hypothesis, yours in focusing on not doing bad,
while mine goes one step further that is on top on not doing bad,
have to do enough good also.
now, which one do you think is better
However your system emphasis on unfairness classification of
people. Your system is unfair and as such fails in every aspect.
Imagine giving heavier sentence to a negro than to a caucasian for
the same offence committed. U think it is desirable ? Now change
the words of negro to non-christians and caucasian to christians of
the above example
Who then shall decide on the allocation of these points ?
Since tis is a "divine" judgement, where people r punished after
the die, then from your religion point of view tat guy is god
Being omnipotent and omniscience and omnipresent etc giving the
correct amount of points for a person is cupcake. However he rather
choose a system whereby non-believer r throw into hell without even
looking at the amount of points he accuminate
I agree with u lots of loopholes in man-made things. Which is
why we need God, and not man-made things.
I never say there r lot of loopholes in man made things. Please
read back again
I tend to think that if the person who murdered someone is
truely repentant, he should be forgiven even in the last min. Even
though he might be hanged on earth for his crimes he should still
be able to go paradise.
If the person who dies is a good boy, then he should be able to go
paradise too.
This is how God treats each and every one of us. He would save us
even in the last min. Ur blood for blood theory is appealing to
humans but not gracious
Then u don't believe in justice and u rather let a murderer go
than a non-believer. The murderer kill a non-believer, and he goes
to heaven while the non-believer goes to hell. Tat just sounds real
fair
Yes you try ur best.....but how best is God's best? If going by
your standards, everyone have sinned and all of us would have to
suffer in hell, either temporal or eternal.
Then u r suggesting everybody to commit as much sins and crimes
as possible since in the end everybody get the same treatment. Is
tat god best ? Then tat is a god who promote sinning
