We are not arguing whether randomness exist in nature - it does
and this is a fact.
Therefore u can't deny tat some people may turn out to be homo
even though they have straight parents or a history of straight
parents.
In the animal kingdom, homosexual animals may not mean they
cannot reproduce. For example, logically you can have a male
frolicking another male, in the process the sperms are spilled,
then a female comes into contact with the sperm and union with her
eggs.
I don't know how tat sounds to u but it sound totally incredible
to me... 2 male species of animal have sex and the sperm flew all
the way into a female ovary... and tis happen for all the
homosexual species of tat animal... tat just sounds really
incredible.... We should really need to study the homing capability
of these sperm to flew against gravity, into the narrow tube of the
female reproduction system and right into her ovary... Frankly I
think the chances of a human inpregnating a female insect is more
likely 
I'm not a homo, so I dunno how homo thinks and feels. Is it a
case of less attracted to women or none at all? Can someone
enlighten me? Thanks.
Well, nobody says homo can't have sex with a woman 
They r also called bisexual...
Well, lets put it tis way, from a medical point of view it is true
tat there is biological difference between homosexual and
heterosexual. It is very hard to convince people tat nature has
totally no effect on a person sexuality. There has been ton on
debate on tis and frankly it seems difficult to reject tis
