Imagine a church priest who stand at the gate of his church and
start discussing about other religions, not only slandering them,
but condemning them as well. And he said its his right to do so
because he stand on the church grounds. Others passerbys are told
they are welcomed not to listen to his speech, because he is within
his spiritual grounds.
This is a clever and subltle way of inciting conflicts and yet
wanting to be held blameless.
Its sumthing i always admire many so called hypocritical christians
for, the ability to manipulate the truth, light into dark, darkness
into light.
Since when was the Muslims allowed to preach to Christians? Do you
see non believers in madrasahs? But i do see, in schools like ACJC
and SAJC, non believers were made to sit down and listen to hours
of preachings.
Do these people know their rights? Being in a submissisive society
in sg, we are just compliant to whatever instructions given to us.
The teachers who knew better, didnt even do anything.
So Muslims had the upper hand? Thinks again, they were labelled
terorrists just because only a few significant persons choose to
join the warpath.
Not forgetting the silly crusade.
