Fact, SIS:
1. You write like crap.... not too bad if everything is contained
in one short paragraph, but to get your message across in lengthy
discussions, you got to do better than that. Not a personal attack
'cos many forumites had conclude this.
I never claim I can write queen's english. I am glad tat u still
understand wat I am writing about. Tat is all tat matters.
2. No matter what answers we come up with you are NEVER
satisfied, not even when non-Christian sources were given. So don't
talk about arguing facts.
The problem is, u r rebutting me and u expect me not do rebut
back ? Must I accept any cock and bull story u written and I cannot
clarify further ? U r not arguing facts. For the mails u have
written in your past few weeks, u have only insulted me, and
doesn't come out with any new facts or refreshing arguments. U r
probably the one tat should talk about arguing facts
3. As far as you are concern, only ONE unexplained anomaly in
the Bible invalidates the whole Bible. May I ask what qualification
do you have to make such a conclusion? When scholars immensely more
intelligent and qualified than you are still arguing both ways.
One ? I trhought I have come out with tonnes of errors and
contradictions. (earth revolving around sun, bats r birds, earth is
flat) Wat qualification do I have ? I thought the bible claims
itself to be error free and ageless ! Surely if a part of it is
wrong, we can come to the conclusion tat the bible is wrong ! It
has failed to support its claims !
4. You have NOT pointed out any truth, the only "truth" that
exist is one that is in your own mind.
Really ? May I ask wat qualifications do u have to make such a
conclusion ? If it aren't true, a person such as u will surely had
raised it out and openly mocked me. It is precisely u can't find
such cases tat is why u had to resort personal attacks
5. You are NOT aloka. Even with his multi-postings on Buddhism,
he does not confront. He is also presenting his truth, but he does
not challenge. YOU START AND END ANTAGONISTIC. Do you expect less
from the replies to your remarks?
U had just said it yourself, I am not aloka. Why should I follow
him ? If u want, u can start and end antagonistic onthe points I
had raise, not on me personally isn't it ?
Tis seemed to be the upteen times u had posted something similar to
tis here. If I am not wrong, u will give another rebuttal
first
1. claiming tat u cannot understand the things I have written, when
clearly u do
2. saying tat u do not want me to agree, but accept all your answer
even if they were wrong
3. saying I hate christians, which is a stupid conclusion just
because I say some christians knock on my door before
4. telling me not to antagonise christainity.
5. saying tat eternal hope is for christainity and they do not want
to hear any opposing views
6. telling people to ignore me since I am not here to learn.
However saying tis has already meant u r here to teach and not
learning yourself.
7. none of your content is going to be related to the topic at all.
It will totally be about me, SIS. In a way, u have deviate from the
main topic in tis thread
8. If all else fails, u just become sarcastic and resort to insults
on me
Is there anything new u wanna add ? Maybe I should compile the
answer and return them to u whenever u raised these points again.
If u have nothing new to add, then don't waste my time.
