....whatever.....
you are obviously not familiar with the concept of "Priesthood of
Believers" ie, all are called to be priests for God....
Then in tat case women should be treated the same as they treat
gays. Girls can never be the husband of household too isn't it ?
According to fandango girls can never be priest either. If u say
tat statement justfiy gays r sinners, then it also justify girls r
equally sinful
Why do u believe homo r sinners anyway... I thought they had proven
tat nature do plays a part for their sexuality. If there is a
sinner, it is god
With regards to homosexual, this is a outright sin. It brings to
mind Sodom and Gohmorrah. There's where the word "sodomy" somes
from by the way.
Where do u find these stories ? tell me
The mentioned church here is totally at the wrong end of
Christianity. When i read the article, the onlything that seems
right was the statement about "Love the sinner but hate the
sin."
Frankly I still can't see why homo is a sin now. Care to
elaborate
As for Old Testament and New Testament, bible-believing churches
always hold to the stand that you must understand both testaments
because 1) Scripture interpret scriptures. 2) New tstament fulfills
old testament.
so both must be believed. Then why not believe in stoning women
etc ? Wat is the justification for not following them ?
Stupidissmart and I (and probably a bunch of other Christians
here) has a long on-going "discussion" on religion. SIS had been
going on and on about his objections. The issue is NOT ABOUT other
genuine seekers or interested party asking questions about
Christianity. These non-believers, which may also include yourself,
at behave properly and ask polite questions. Even when there is a
disagreement, everyone walks away happy. SIS seem to have a feud
with Christians by and large and had been incessant with his
attacks.
I thought christians ask others to be open minded ? Why r u
yourself close minded and not believe u may be wrong. I thought
earlier u have come up with 3 conclusions, one of them stating tat
u yourself may be wrong. Aren't u interested in finding the truth ?
U prefer to cheat yourself and not hear anything against it ? As I
said many times, I do not hurl verbal abuses without reasons. I
brought my arguments and facts over and talk about it. Instead of
pondering on the points, u just came up with answer tat state "I do
not know why it seems wrong, but I don't care" Why can't u think
tat maybe the whole idea is man made and is just a big lie.
His modus operandi is that he is after the truth and that
Christian doctrine are based on lies and inconsistency. So
passionate is his "crusade" that he spents a huge amount of his
time to research into anti-Christian sites to support his
counterarguments. Strangely in the seek for consistency and fact,
he only target Christians. Not once did he have any to say about
other religion which have their fair share of myths and
confusion.
Why r u so against me for not talking about other religion ? Why
should I ? If u like to talk about them, u do all the talking
yourself, don't drag me in.
Again please let me apologise to you if you had been offended by
my statements. It was directed only at one person.
Not one single person had been so offensive in this forum and it is
probably true that most Christians are irritated by his stance.
I guess as much, resorting to personal attacks in the end. Most
christian r probably irritated because they r see the ugly side of
christainity, tat probably it all is just one big lie.
