Structured essay question:
Describe how the new annoucements sound like and what many SMRT
passenger feel about it.
________________________________________________________
Compare the differences between a refurbished C151 train and a
unrefurbished C151 train
________________________________________________________
Compare the differences between a refurbished C151 train and
a C751B train
________________________________________________________
I will make the first question a SBQ:
Soucre A:
(Taken from ST forum Online story:
http://www.straitstimes.com/ST%2BForum/Online%2BStory/STIStory_202479.html)
<!-- more than 7 paragraphs --><!-- story content :
start -->
AS A Singaporean and frequent MRT commuter, and on behalf of the
many people I know who feel the same, I would like to urge SMRT to
review the new announcements of station names that are used in the
trains, as well as the announcements on free bus services at
certain stations, etc.
It has been a few weeks since the new announcements were put
into use and, for a long time, I had thought the new announcements
were recorded by internal staff and was only temporary, or that it
was some tertiary students' year-end project. I had thought so
simply because the pronunciation, enunciation and intonation of the
spoken English was very poor and awkward.
Just to name a few of the jarring problems: Orchard was
pronounced as something akin to Oooh-church. Yishun sounded
something akin to Yeeee-Soon. And among many other pronunciation
problems, the intonation of 'Please mind the platform gap' was
awfully contorted as well.
This is totally not an issue of 'getting used to it over time'.
Neither is it an issue of a local
Singaporean accent, because even the average Singaporean English
does not sound like that. The issue is that the announcer sounded
like she deliberately put on some bizarre accent, and added tonal
acrobatics, thinking that it will sound like better English.
The English heard in the train announcements just didn't make
the cut.
My peers and I are quite appalled to realise that the new change
is not temporary but a deliberate 'make-over' which is meant to be
used permanently. We take MRT frequently, and the in-train
announcements really do make us cringe, every single time.
<!-- show media links starting at 7th para -->
Recently, I had two groups of foreign friends who were visiting
Singapore from Vancouver and London respectively, and while
travelling with them in the train, both groups had commented
politely but bemusedly at the announcement voice. It was rather
embarrassing, but I told them my then honest belief that the
in-train announcements were just temporary.
I understand that SMRT may have good intentions in refreshing
the announcement system and in hoping that the new announcements
will sound younger and friendlier. However, the overhaul is really
not very successful. The general sentiment of fellow commuters
(including my visiting friends from Vancouver) is that the in-train
announcements sounded strange, flirtatious and very 'low budget'
(for lack of a better description) instead.
Having said that, I do find the other new announcements
refreshing - one example being the announcement for reporting of
suspicious articles in the station. It sounds younger and sweeter,
and words were enunciated clearly and correctly. Similarly, the
Mandarin announcements were all enunciated clearly and correctly,
and as I do not understand Malay and Tamil I am unable to make any
comments.
Nonetheless, the 'rights' do not rectify all 'the wrongs' that
we hear all the time in the trains. I believe that most people do
not mind a new voice for our MRT system. However, it must still
adhere to a certain standard of good quality. I hope SMRT will
seriously review the new announcements.
From source A, what can you infer about the new
annoucements?
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________