hey kristovorus, i'm impressed by some of your answers..

but going by your logic, my fren's dog is weird cos he will lick
my fren's face whenever she blows air at his face.. when another
fren did the same thing, the dog licked her face too...
but i guess different dogs have different personalities... same
like human beings with weird fetish.. lol... erm... now i want to
ask... am i right to say dogs have different
personalities? this term seems oddly paired with
an animal... lol
i think its better to assume that the dog will behave
differently to different people instead.Since it is YOUR friend's
dog, it might like her alot ( growing to like her scent ) and hence
lick her face.
However, if another person did the same thing a different set of
response might occur?
Not really sure about it, would you like to experiment? =x
Anyway, you cannot use personalities for non-humans, unless they
exhibit person-like behaviours. When you attribute human-like
qualities to an an object/animal, you are using a literary device
called " personification " eg. " diamonds are women's best friend
". Only humans can be friends right? In this case a literal licence
is allowed. Your usage doesnt really sound right, but is
technically permited