You are assuming that ALL marriage is the result of a "good"
choice. In reality, that is not the case. There's good marriage,
then theres the mediocre and bad ones.
To qualify for the "reward" ?
By depriving the rights given to another person, you are
essentially punishing.
A mother is a mother.. no matter what her marital status is.
A single mother is no less important than a married mother, so
why do we need them to "qualify" for that reward ? They should
automatically qualify the moment she is pregnant.
Punish for her life choices... ? Then should we also punish
those women who married lousy men ? I think its about time..
we stop "punishing". Because punishing is just a tool of
manipulation to favor one side.
ALL mothers should be treated the same. Married
or not.
don't be a dick and always start with nonsensical statements you
know the other side don't subcribe to.
obviously not all marriages are the results of a "good " choice.
sometimes good mariages arise from bad choices, others end up badly
even though both sides made a "good" choice.
what we have here is a political system that decides
good/acceptable versus bad/unacceptable and then
systematically rewards those who participates.
not personal moral values.
just like I personally don't give a shit whether gays are
married or not, just don't force it down my throat and proclaim in
the name of freedom I must support you.
but obviously the govt does. hence 377A
but yes as a single mother you get "punished" for your choice. .
like you get "punished" for all other wrong choices in your
life.
women who married lousy men are already punished for their
choices. as for all mothers should be treated the same. nope
sorry
I'll still disagree. like as mentioned. I believe they should
have housing covered and the chance to provide necessities. beyond
that you are punishing the rest who made the "correct" choice in
the govt's eyes