I used to teach Bible studies and apologetics in a church, and
yes. I think our discussion has yielded some reasons for my
non-belief. I wanted to talk more about the Urey-Miller
experiment...
I think you've misunderstood the argument. The argument from
evil is not to prove that God does not exist. The arguments tries
to show that an omnipotent/omnibenevolent God does not exist. If
one professes one's God to be non-omnibenevolent (such as William
Lane Craig, and I suspect Alvin Plantinga), then the argument from
evil will not be a suitable disproof as an non-omnibenevolentl God
is perfectly compatible with the existence of evil in the
world.
Interesting that you taught Bible study and apologetics for 12
years in a church. So I presume you had been a Christian for more
years than that? If so, then I assume you will not have much
trouble following my arguments.
Please feel free to speak your mind on the Miller experiment. My
earlier point was that had they been successful they would not have
proved that abiogenesis happened, but that life required
intelligent design. They would only have proven that life could be
formed in a lab, but not in a primordial soup millions of years ago
which they assumed they knew how it was like.
But why would the existence of evil means that the Christian God
does not exist? Clearly you must have added some other premises to
come to that conclusion.