In my humble opinion....
This Subhas reminds me of another lawyer, named
err....forgot...also an Indian. The lawyer which like to represent
PAP, and last time represented SPH against NKF.
Ok I googled, his name is Davinder Singh.
Remember him?
Last time when SPH was in court wiith NKF....many people on forums
were praising Davinder as hero, because he was exposing NKF, being
champion of the people, etc.
I wonder if they would be saying the same things during the cases
when he represented PAP to sue opposition, or sue overseas
magazines, etc.
I wonder what would people's comments be?
Now.....I believe Davinder Singh and Subhas Anandan are similar but
different. There are similarities, but there are differences.
To me....a true lawyer....must have some ideals...and uphold his
profession's ideals.
For instance, if you are a soldier....when u see an enemy, u must
kill him....but if you are a doctor....when u see a wounded person,
u must cure him....
So if a soldier kill an enemy solider, he is good, but if a doctor
cure an enemy soldier, he is also good.
They must uphold their true beliefs and what their profession's
ideals are. And they must also personally belief their professional
ideals in their heart.
For people like lawyers who represent 'sure lose' cases, of the
most gory types who everybody else seem avoiding or unwilling to
take....murderers, rapists, etc....for us the general public, it is
hard to emphatize or comprehend, but I believe those lawyers are
people who seriously absorb and live their ideals, trying to not
waver, and living by the philosophy of their profession.
So I give them A+
Meat Pao.
