kindly refer to UN law of the sea. or other wise known as
UNCLOS
its not even an iota as simple as what you think it is. on your
simplistic idiot lion level is a military level security
competition.
at higher levels of thought, its something far more complicated.
like the failure of international regulatory mechanisms, failure of
diplomatic communication. conflicting soverignity, use of sea as
common territory, competition for scarce resources, civilizational
clash, culture wars, american neo-imperialist hegemony. rise
of china theory, china containment, congagement china, china vs usa
: conflict theory, china and US : odd bedfellows for the 21st
century, ASEAN structural failure, ASEAN +3 weaknesses, UN
weaknesses which one you want to apply here ? all are
relevant and simulteneously individually irrelevant if you look at
it.
tell me, does global security tell you any of that ? does
information think for you ? information merely facilitates
thinking. you are NOT thinking.
merely copy and paste information. essentialized and simplified
tidbits for the masses. politically constructed gibberish that you
cannot percieve beyond.
information is power. but power is nothing if you dont know how
to wield it or apply it or analyze it. and power is dangerous in
the wrong hands. especially like yours. be like the media. spin it
into sensationalist bullshit. power without control is nothing.
thats why people pay for good quality analysis and not
information. we live in an age of information excess. what people
need is smart, clear and proper analysis. not bullcrap plucked from
a multitiude of sources and wrecked with inaccuracies
quit posting sensationalist drama here. if you want to
contribute something, do think about what you are posting.
if lionnoisy can spam the same shit repeatedly, so will
i.